Search for: "Waits v. State" Results 5321 - 5340 of 10,692
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2012, 1:39 pm by Lyle Denniston
   The court rejected that argument, saying that, while the Supreme Court ruling (in Crawford v. [read post]
10 Jan 2025, 4:12 pm
” However, this ruling was subsequently appealed by the state, and the case was sent back to Benitez for reconsideration in light of the Supreme Court’s landmark New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 5:46 am by John McKiggan
Supreme Court Denies Alberta Leave to Appeal Accident victims in Alberta have been waiting for leave (permission) from the Supreme Court of Canada to appeal the decision of Morrow v. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm by NL
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for an oral hearing… [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm by NL
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for an oral hearing… [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 11:41 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Nonimmigrants in valid V-1 or V-2/V-3 status or K-3/K-4 status who have an I-485 application pending also do not need advance parole. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 6:03 pm by Danielle Beach-Oswald
  The opinion piece in the New York Times was based on Judulang v. [read post]