Search for: "A B C Insurance"
Results 5341 - 5360
of 5,821
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2008, 7:41 pm
C. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 7:04 pm
FOS commenced operations on 1 July 2008 and provides dispute resolution services for up to 80% of Australian banking, insurance and investment disputes. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 6:41 pm
An application for child's insurance benefits is filed; B. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 5:08 pm
Francis Health Services, Inc. d/b/a St. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 3:05 pm
I think it's either (b) or (c), which are pretty much mutually exclusive, and I'm not sure which is worse. [read post]
20 Sep 2008, 6:31 pm
That points to methods (b) or (c), not (a). [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 9:36 am
" Thus, in determining if the imputation doctrine applied, the Third Circuit needed to determine if Chait was (a) acting in the course and scope of his employment when he committed wrongdoing; (b) if the wrongdoing benefited the company; and (c) if it did not benefit the company, was Chait the only agent of Ambassador. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 1:26 am
So to see that in writing was startling to me, and could only happen where a) a plaintiff's lawyer had no stake whatsoever in defending the conduct of his predecessor, b) his clients would benefit by distancing themselves from that conduct and c) the claims truly were unfounded and the lawyer would face ethical problems by saying otherwise (if "c" were not true, the lawyer would just be supplying ammunition against himself and other… [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 1:26 am
So to see that in writing was startling to me, and could only happen where a) a plaintiff's lawyer had no stake whatsoever in defending the conduct of his predecessor, b) his clients would benefit by distancing themselves from that conduct and c) the claims truly were unfounded and the lawyer would face ethical problems by saying otherwise (if "c" were not true, the lawyer would just be supplying ammunition against himself and other… [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:01 pm
Furthermore, the "odds" are complicated by the fact that many women - especially sexually active minors who have not received accurate and complete sex education - operate under misapprehensions about how likely they are to become pregnant, including the false beliefs that (a) pregnancy is impossible the first time, (b) withdrawal before ejaculation precludes conception, and (c) sex in positions other than the missionary protect against conception. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 1:00 pm
The model graduated drivers licensing program requires young novice drivers to proceed through three stages: (a) learner's permit, (b) intermediate or provisional license, and (c) a full license. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 9:23 pm
Corp.; complaint alleged violation of Section 8(b)(3). [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 10:52 am
The policy includes the following: (1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), it shall be a prima facie violation of T.C.A. 63-6-214 (b) (1), (4), and (12) for a physician to prescribe or dispense any drug to any individual, whether in person or by electronic means or over the Internet or over telephone lines, unless the physician has first done and appropriately documented, for the person to whom a prescription is to be issued or drugs dispensed, all of the following: (a)… [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 9:38 pm
In the portion of section 7 that was not substantively amended by the Capital Markets Efficiency Act, the word ``and'' was inserted, which could be read to mean that margin lending would be unlawful only if both elements of the pre-existing prohibitions were violated, when prior to the Capital Markets Efficiency Act violation of either prong was sufficient to make such margin lending unlawful.Specifically, the first prong, section 7(c)(1)(A), states that margin lending is unlawful… [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 1:24 pm
; (c) hospitals and other providers are almost encouraged to inflate "list prices" for services (to boost Medicare reimbursement, even though the actual charges to insurance companies are well below those levels); and (d) politicians obscure the real problems by blaming anyone seeking to shift the parameters ... the results are pretty obvious.Moving from employer-based to individual-linked "coverage," and away from such "insured" status for… [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:37 pm
Here's a copy of the motion, and here's part of what the motion says: After engaging in extensive discovery, the Plaintiffs have determined the following: (a) the McIntosh dwelling was damaged as a result of Hurricane Katrina; (b) the majority of the damage to the McIntosh dwelling was caused by flooding; (c) the McIntosh dwelling sustained flood damage of at least $250,000 to the structure and $100,000 to its contents; (d) State… [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:37 pm
Here's a copy of the motion, and here's part of what the motion says: After engaging in extensive discovery, the Plaintiffs have determined the following: (a) the McIntosh dwelling was damaged as a result of Hurricane Katrina; (b) the majority of the damage to the McIntosh dwelling was caused by flooding; (c) the McIntosh dwelling sustained flood damage of at least $250,000 to the structure and $100,000 to its contents; (d) State… [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
Wheeler, No. 07-1816 Conviction and sentence for embezzling, stealing or otherwise converting employee contributions to a company's health insurance and 401(k) funds in violation of 18 U.S.C. sections 669 and 664, are affirmed over claims that the district court: 1) erred in defining the mens rea element of the offense under section 669; 2) admitted impermissible prior act evidence in violation of Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b); and 3) imposed an enhancement that lacked… [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
: (Chinese Law Prof Blog), China – The intellectual property rights crisis: (Ezine @rticles) Europe European Court of Justice to consider trade mark questions in Case C-342/08 Makro Zelfbedieningsgroothandel e.a. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
Whitley, No. 06-0131 In a criminal law matter, petition for review of decision denying rehearing is denied where the court declined to depart from the literal wording of the "except" clause of 18 U.S.C. section 924(c)(1)(A). . [read post]
