Search for: "Arizona Supreme Court" Results 5341 - 5360 of 9,124
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2012, 6:46 pm by lawmrh
Supremes on Arizona’s illegal immigration SB 1070 in the case known officially as 11-182 Arizona et al. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 3:42 pm by Howard Schweitzer
  Despite initial characterization in the press as a split decision, the Supreme Court's ruling in Arizona v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 3:24 pm
This week the Supreme Court struck down part of the law while leaving part of the law untouched. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 1:26 pm by WIMS
Supreme Court has agreed to hear the appeal of Georgia-Pacific (GP) West, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 12:17 pm
  The Ninth Circuit struck down the law in its entirety, and Arizona appealed to the US Supreme Court. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 12:17 pm
The United States Supreme Court handed down its long anticiated ruling in Arizona v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 11:08 am by Bradley Maged
The “victory” that Brewer claimed after yesterday’s Supreme Court ruling was essentially rendered meaningless by these actions by the DOJ. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 11:05 am by jleaming@acslaw.org
by Jeremy Leaming For what seems like decades a conventional wisdom, built largely by a handful of Supreme Court correspondents, has held that Justice Antonin Scalia is the high court’s most brilliant, disciplined, albeit ideological, member. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 9:39 am by Greg Siskind
Do you think the Supreme Court should have invalidated three sections of the Arizona immigration law? [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 8:41 am by Greg Siskind
For those focused on aiding the undocumented, the President's announcement on deferred action and the Supreme Court ruling in the Arizona case are largely good developments. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 8:34 am by Dan Filler
Alabama, the Supreme Court did offer up a life changing decision for potentially thousands of children. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 8:33 am by nflatow
U.S., the Supreme Court only upheld Section 2(B) of the highly controversial Arizona immigration law, also known as SB 1070 (Arizona's Senate Bill 1070). [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 8:32 am by Lovechilde
Regressives on the Supreme Court have opened the floodgates to unlimited money from billionaires and corporations overwhelming our democracy, on the bizarre theory that money is speech under the First Amendment and corporations are people. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 8:15 am by Matt Brown
The Supreme Court of Arizona held that was an improper restriction on the professional independence of the individual city prosecutors as well as a threat to the independence of the judiciary and an abuse of Rule 10.2 that significantly frustrated its purpose. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 7:40 am by Gritsforbreakfast
While the US Supreme Court yesterday struck down most of Arizona's law targeting illegal immigrants (see the opinions), the court declined to rule on one key provision [§2(B)] - whether police could be required to check immigration status of people they detain - saying the issue wasn't yet ripe for federal review. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 6:56 am by admin
Supreme Court on Monday stroke down 3 out of 4 provisions of Arizona’s immigration enforcement law, but upheld the provision that requires local police to check the immigration status of anyone they have “reasonable suspicion” to believe is in the U.S. unlawfully. “This ruling is, on balance, encouraging, particularly because the court kept the door open to future challenges to the racial profiling provision. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 6:56 am by admin
Supreme Court on Monday stroke down 3 out of 4 provisions of Arizona’s immigration enforcement law, but upheld the provision that requires local police to check the immigration status of anyone they have “reasonable suspicion” to believe is in the U.S. unlawfully. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 6:14 am
Jane Pauk of Phoenix demonstrates at the Supreme Court after the justices ruled on Arizona''s immigration law. [read post]