Search for: "Blood v. Blood"
Results 5341 - 5360
of 7,197
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2011, 9:23 am
The 4th Circuit's ruling in U.S. v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:27 am
Moses, who was “unrelated by blood or law to Ms. [read post]
14 May 2011, 2:17 pm
(O.V.I. in Ohio), and the officer is requesting that you submit to a blood, breath or urine test. [read post]
13 May 2011, 6:07 pm
Plaintiffs admitted they had nothing more than elevated blood readings. [read post]
13 May 2011, 9:18 am
In Santa Clara County, authorities are going to be reviewing the nearly 1,000 DUI cases because of a manufacturing error in the Alco-Sensor V breathalyzer. [read post]
13 May 2011, 9:18 am
In Santa Clara County, authorities are going to be reviewing the nearly 1,000 DUI cases because of a manufacturing error in the Alco-Sensor V breathalyzer. [read post]
12 May 2011, 12:22 pm
The Fifth Court of Appeals in Dallas, Texas avoided directly addressing the question in the case of Swenson v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 1:56 pm
” People v Crear, 242 Mich App 158, 166; 618 NW2d 91 (2000), overruled in part on other grounds People v Miller, 482 Mich 540; 759 NW2d 850 (2008). [read post]
11 May 2011, 6:30 am
Not Guilty Complete Acquittal – DUI & DWI (.104 Blood) – West Mesa Justice Court [read post]
10 May 2011, 5:41 pm
The next person to blow into the PAS device would mix his or her breath with the already existing condensation, giving a higher blood alcohol equivalent reading. [read post]
9 May 2011, 11:30 pm
Arthur recently was retained to represent a driver who although had a blood-alcohol rate of 07%/07% was charged with a 23152 (a) V C. [read post]
9 May 2011, 10:24 pm
Defense lawyers say cases in which suspects blew into the device but later refused to give a blood test are now suspect -- since the state's main piece of evidence may be compromised. [read post]
9 May 2011, 2:07 pm
In the San Jose breathalyzer problem, the Alco-Sensor V breathalyzer sometimes showed incorrect readings because of a manufacturer's error that can cause condensation to build up in the tube. [read post]
9 May 2011, 2:07 pm
In the San Jose breathalyzer problem, the Alco-Sensor V breathalyzer sometimes showed incorrect readings because of a manufacturer's error that can cause condensation to build up in the tube. [read post]
9 May 2011, 1:30 pm
In March, in Connick v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 8:00 am
Greene and Alford v. [read post]
7 May 2011, 8:15 am
According to People magazine, Springfield's blood alcohol content was measured at .10, over the .08 limit in California. [read post]
7 May 2011, 5:41 am
United States v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 8:09 am
Neff, United States v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 4:00 am
In Stinemetz v. [read post]
