Search for: "Cooper v. State"
Results 5341 - 5360
of 7,450
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2013, 10:04 pm
In US v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:47 am
Timmerman-Cooper, No. 07-3339 Dismissal of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus is affirmed where it was not objectively unreasonable for a state court of appeals to find that the use of videoconferencing at petitioner's parole revocation hearing did not violate his rights to due process and to confront his accuser, and therefore did not violate the Fifth and Sixth Amendments. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 8:23 am
Cooper Wiring Devices, Inc., No. 06-763, 2007 WL 2891401 (N.D. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:49 pm
CPD will continue to cooperate with federal authorities in investigating and apprehending violent criminals who may be undocumented immigrants. [read post]
5 May 2025, 4:33 am
Last week in the courts On Friday, 2 May 2025, the Court of Appeal dismissed the Secretary of State’s appeal in the case of Liberty v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2025] EWCA Civ 571. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 12:07 pm
(Yellow Cab Cooperative v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 3:00 am
(West 1990); contra White v. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 3:05 pm
State v. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 12:01 pm
(Halkbank) v. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 12:01 pm
(Halkbank) v. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 5:50 am
Human Rights Committee’s decision in Teitiota v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 5:00 am
Lujan v. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 6:40 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 6:38 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 2:50 pm
The first case he discussed was Murray v. [read post]
19 Jan 2020, 10:45 am
The case is called Wortman v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 12:06 pm
State v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:45 am
In McNally v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 8:52 am
The Kyoto accords had their counterpart in the federal government’s efforts to control the production of every bushel of wheat on every American farm in Wickard v. [read post]
27 May 2012, 5:42 pm
UN member states asked the UK about ‘super-injunctions’, online freedom of expression and the defamation bill: “The UK’s representative at the review, Lord McNally, responded to the questions and recommendations regarding defamation and its impact on freedom of expression by stating that ‘his baby’ aimed to get the balance right between a free media and the right of the individual to privacy, and that it was regarded as a ‘good law’… [read post]