Search for: "D. STEVENS"
Results 5341 - 5360
of 6,908
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2010, 10:51 am
§ 1.56(d). [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 7:12 pm
Had the Court in Stevens accepted the argument that depictions of animal cruelty are sufficiently similar to child pornography to warrant a categorical exception, then it might have "GVR'd" (granted cert, vacated, and remanded) the EMA case for reconsideration. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 3:33 pm
In a vacuum, you’d say that Kennedy would get Bilski purely on seniority and relegate Thomas to the dull bankruptcy opinion in Schwab. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 6:30 pm
§ 3664(d)(5) is effective—but it directly touches the lives of an abnormally large number of interested parties. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
FERC, 520 F.3d 464 (2008), rev’d sub nom. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 6:00 am
d. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 3:15 pm
Navy’s failure to warn President Franklin D. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 9:05 am
He said that he'd debated it with others on the committee and they'd concluded that on balance I'd get them 2 or 3 more votes than I'd cost them.) [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 6:18 pm
If you're keeping score, that's R 12 - D 4. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 5:47 pm
Post a comment here or, if you'd rather, send me an email. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 12:47 pm
Otherwise, you'd disclose it, right? [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 10:53 am
My thoughts are still in a relatively early stage, and so I’d love to get input from fellow Prawfs readers on what I’ve come up with. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 9:16 am
" But before reading a post on the DC Dicta blog on Monday, I'd always sort of thought that SCOTUS's collective ignorance of common tech was limited to the visibly ancient Justices, like the retiring John Paul Stevens. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 5:07 am
As the decision in Stevens came out yesterday after I'd gotten down to work, and has since been announced and discussed everywhere in the blawgosphere, there's no point in mentioning that the Supreme Court, in a case that presented (hopefully) the most extreme example of speech unworthy of protection, upheld the First Amendment anyway. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 12:00 am
Stevens. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 10:41 pm
‘‘(D) APPLICATION OF EXCEPTION. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 3:27 pm
“When state medical regulators sent [Denis’ doctor Steven Kaplan] letters suggesting the dosages were worrisome, he ignored them. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 3:10 pm
"The institution means a great deal to him -- I'd say more to him than his own personal legacy," Gerhardt said. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 2:28 pm
“From 1791 to the present,” however, the First Amendment has “permitted restrictions upon the content of speech in a few limited areas,” and has never “include[d] a freedom to disregard these traditional limitations. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 1:35 pm
Steven Menashi (Stanford 2008 / D. [read post]
