Search for: "Defendant Doe 2" Results 5341 - 5360 of 40,587
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2018, 6:53 am by Steven Cohen
  The defendants argue that his expert testimony is not reliable and does not fit the case. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 9:01 am by Steven Cohen
Mancini’s report should be excluded, arguing 1) that his opinions improperly state legal conclusions, 2) that Mr. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 12:15 pm by Steven Cohen
   Even though his methodology can’t be peer reviewed (this type of expert analysis does not not lend itself to peer review), Mr. [read post]
3 Jul 2010, 11:04 am by Russell Mace
(2) Does the evidence presented prove the Defendant's innocence? [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 3:14 pm
” Specifically, the defendant is only liable for gross receipts that the defendant, himself, received as a result of the criminal activity. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 2:30 pm
There's other very nice language along the "judicial restraint" line that we'd love to see other courts adopt when plaintiffs bring forth their next bizarre and novel theory for expanding liabilty to everybody in the world.(2) The bottom line:We agree with defendants that the public nuisance claim should have been dismissed at the outset because the state has not and cannot allege that defendants' conduct interfered with a public right or that… [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 7:00 am by Aurora Barnes
Idaho 18-679 Issues: (1) Whether certain of the “aggravating circumstances” used by Idaho to determine whether a defendant may be sentenced to death—those that ask whether the crime was especially “heinous, atrocious or cruel, manifesting exceptional depravity”; whether the defendant exhibited “utter disregard for human life”; and whether the defendant “has exhibited a propensity to commit murder”—fail to… [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 8:29 am by Nissenbaum Law Group
Internet Law: Federal Case Law: Anonymous Speech: Two female Yale law students recently brought suit in the United States District Court in Connecticut, in Doe I and Doe II v. [read post]
15 Nov 2009, 7:30 am
However, the requested motion in limine is far too broad and erroneously excludes the opportunity for rebuttal opinions and does not consider prejudice, if any, in allowing the expert's testimony. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:25 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Food companies were most likely to have a marketing policy: 2/3rds. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 2:49 pm
Therefore, the government does not need to prove that defendant Bravo gave, offered, or agreed to offer the trip to Las Vegas before defendant Martínez performed any official action or series of acts. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 2:53 pm by Eugene Volokh
Cal. 2013) (defendant's blog posts -- that the plaintiffs infringed the defendant's copyrights -- was not actionable because the post was an opinion that expressed the defendant's understanding of copyright law).... [read post]