Search for: "Doe Defendants I through V"
Results 5341 - 5360
of 12,268
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2016, 8:39 am
Miller v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 8:33 am
A defendant who is considering a fair cross-section claim may obtain information about the jury selection system through discovery. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 8:33 am
A defendant who is considering a fair cross-section claim may obtain information about the jury selection system through discovery. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 8:05 am
Diversity of creative voices/creator can be central v. network TV; global audiences allow you to prove your worth w/o a gatekeeper.Betsy Rosenblatt, Legal Director, Organization for Transformative Works: 700,000 registered users on AO3, 150 million page views/week, all through volunteers. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 3:56 am
Orin refers to Brown v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 7:43 am
“[S]ection 5 of article XIII does not establish any ‘vesting rules,’” the Court wrote. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 5:47 am
Handsome Brook Farm, LLC v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 12:10 pm
If he is, then yeah, he does the full 32 months. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 11:13 am
What follows is the second of three posts on Capitol Records v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 1:07 pm
Obviously if the court gave an active sentence—which is authorized in this C/I/A grid cell, or in any misdemeanor grid cell through the “active punishment exception” of G.S. 15A-1340.20(c1)—the jail credit would exceed the sentence and the defendant would be immediately released to time already served. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 1:07 pm
Obviously if the court gave an active sentence—which is authorized in this C/I/A grid cell, or in any misdemeanor grid cell through the “active punishment exception” of G.S. 15A-1340.20(c1)—the jail credit would exceed the sentence and the defendant would be immediately released to time already served. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 11:57 am
No, but I have gone on through [my friend’s] Facebook and had seen it through his page. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 5:43 am
I argued that was wrong. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 1:51 am
Rodriguez v. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 11:28 pm
The case of Brown v. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 1:35 pm
But, the fact that it does so will not end DOJ's "inquiry into whether and which individuals will be pursued. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 1:35 pm
But, the fact that it does so will not end DOJ's "inquiry into whether and which individuals will be pursued. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 12:32 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 8:30 am
, Levitt v. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 6:50 am
So why does it continue? [read post]
