Search for: "Does 1 - 33" Results 5341 - 5360 of 6,150
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2012, 9:23 pm
By Act 33 of 2006, the Parliament brought in significant changes in 2000 Act. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 7:51 am
  Introduction           Picture yourself in the shoes of Maria Udy, a marketing executive working for a travel management firm in Maryland. [1]  Udy, a British citizen traveling from Washington D.C. to London, was pulled aside by a federal agent because he had "a security concern" with her. [2]   She was presented with a frustrating choice:  hand over her laptop for the… [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am by Bexis
The following post is exclusively the work of the Reed Smith side of the blog.Sometimes the smallest, least significant type of lawsuit can illustrate cracks in the edifice of the largest, most consequential litigation. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 7:24 am by Helen Klein Murillo, Susan Hennessey
So how exactly does a civil suit on a privacy tort help us to better understand the available criminal charges? [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 8:37 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  (I’m pretty sure that the “incontestable” part there doesn’t work, inasmuch as §33(b) is in the statute precisely to establish descriptive fair use as a defense as to incontestable marks.) [read post]
24 Oct 2020, 4:45 pm by Kevin Kaufman
A Pro-Growth Approach to UK Tax Policy So what does a pro-growth tax system look like? [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 7:20 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
Currently, there are Proclamations in effect that cover 33 countries which basically say anyone that has been present in any of these 33 countries within the last 14 days, can’t travel to the United States, and that means we can’t issue visas to them. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:43 am by Matthias Weller
Being a devolved matter, this step requires the Central Government to obtain the approval of a Northern Ireland Department (Roinn i dTuaisceart Éireann) and the Scottish Ministers (Mhinistearan na h-Alba).[31] Furthermore, this approach also implies that there will be no comparable exclusion of insurance matters as under the HCCH 2005 Convention.[32] However, the Responses contemplated making use of the bilateralisation mechanism in relation to the Russian Federation upon its accession to the… [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:16 pm by Thornhill Law Firm, APLC
Safeway Insurance Company of Louisiana, No. 99-1625 (LA S.Ct. 1/19/00) 753 So.2d 170 (La. 2000). [read post]
6 May 2024, 11:57 am by Robichaud
Nor does this intend to cover other forms of releases such as Undertakings to Peace Officers, or Promises to Appear. [read post]
6 May 2024, 11:57 am by Robichaud
Nor does this intend to cover other forms of releases such as Undertakings to Peace Officers, or Promises to Appear. [read post]