Search for: "Does 1-35"
Results 5341 - 5360
of 9,560
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2014, 10:39 am
According to law enforcement, the chase began on Grove Street around 1:35 p.m. last Thursday when an officer says he spotted the Defendant throw a small black safe into a dumpster. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 9:00 pm
By January 1, there were only 18,000 men in the army. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 9:30 am
All these imply that setting of levies must follow a two-step process:1. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 8:48 am
The claim here does not do so. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 7:50 am
As policy makers continue to discuss patent reform, commentators have opined that 35 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 12:26 pm
A rollover crash, like the name implies, is one where the vehicle flips over and does not remain right-side up. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 9:52 am
Next, Midcal gives us a two-part test for lower-level actors: (1) the anticompetitive policy must be clearly articulated by the state and (2) the state must actively supervise the implementation of the anticompetitive policy. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 8:00 am
However, at least 35 states have some limitation on medical malpractice damages. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 2:17 pm
No. 12/348,892 1/5/2009 Issued 2/22/2011 7,892,281 The patent statute (35 U.S.C. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 11:18 am
A 10 or 20 percent difference does not change this conclusion. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 7:10 pm
[…] Claim 1 does no more than call on a “computing device,” with basic functionality for comparing stored and input data and rules, to do what doctors do routinely. [read post]
25 Jan 2014, 8:58 am
The Federal Tax rate on estates over $5,340,000 has been increased from 35% to 40%. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 6:59 pm
” 35 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:41 pm
Section 3 of the Patent Act of 1793 stated, in relevant part: That every inventor, before he can receive a patent, shall swear or affirm that he does verily believe, that he is the true inventor or discoverer… Patent Act of 1793, Ch. 11, 1 Stat. 318-323 (February 21, 1793). [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
The two primary underpinnings of the BJR are: 1. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
The two primary underpinnings of the BJR are: 1. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 6:53 am
(1) Adoption of comment k across the board in strict liability does not preclude a negligence cause of action concerning the “design” of a prescription drug. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 6:11 am
The Chief writes: A system claim generally covers what the system is, not what the system does. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 7:43 pm
Fact is, while the Colorado law says you can smoke marijuana, it does not say you can have as much as you want. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 2:04 pm
The Chief writes: A system claim generally covers what the system is, not what the system does. [read post]
