Search for: "FELTS v. STATE"
Results 5341 - 5360
of 5,742
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2010, 6:09 am
Structural Shifts: concomitant widespread elimination of (i) supermajority voting requirements, (ii) staggered or classified board terms, and (iii) stockholder rights plans (often done to avoid or compromise likely stockholder proposals), accompanied by limitations on (iv) change-in-control executive severance agreements, along with (v) increased stockholder rights to call special stockholder meetings, in tandem with (vi) highly publicized proposals advocating multiflavored… [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 7:56 am
Stopthemillenniumhollywood.com, et al. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 11:56 am
The first injunction doesn't matter anymore because Motorola recently felt forced to accept an offer by Apple (which is not even based on a particular amount of money since the royalty rate will have to be set by a court of law) for taking a license to Motorola's wireless SEPs. [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court, in Washington v. [read post]
29 Sep 2024, 3:41 pm
Department of State. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 1:03 pm
Federal Election Commission and McCutcheon v. [read post]
1 Nov 2024, 11:40 am
For example, the above quoted Section from Chapter H-V 2.7 cannot be found in the Guidelines of 2009 or of 2013. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 2:44 pm
In today’s case, Thauili v. [read post]
9 Apr 2022, 3:01 am
Doe v. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 12:14 pm
v. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 6:00 am
The effect of the residential schools on Aboriginal peoples is still felt today. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 6:55 am
The certificate of coverage was of no use because it stated both names on it. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 12:00 am
Section 10 states as follows: “10. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 6:16 am
The debate over what is often termed “jawboning” will come before the Supreme Court, which will hear arguments in Murthy v. [read post]
24 Dec 2006, 6:06 am
The incessant abstraction felt wrong to me. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 5:50 am
Innovation Ventures, LLC v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 1:44 pm
Round Two: rehearing by the AHRC; an appeal from the AHRC’s 2020 decision (Amir and Siddique v. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 9:05 am
When the IRS happens upon the money trail, and a top prosecutor leans on him to turn state’s evidence and finger some of the corrupt justices, Robbie calls on George Mason, veteran Kindle County lawyer, to represent him and win the best deal he can. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 9:22 pm
Relation of this Final Rule to the July 2, 2009, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking V. [read post]
13 Jan 2025, 5:33 am
”He felt otherwise about the Bureau of Chemistry and its famous, headstrong Chief Chemist. [read post]
