Search for: "Grant v Grant" Results 5341 - 5360 of 104,899
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2023, 8:15 am by Eric Columbus
“...EVERYONE UNDERSTANDS THAT THE PRESIDENTIAL RECORDS ACT, PLUS THE CLINTON SOCKS CASE, TOTALLY EXONERATED ME FROM THE CONTINUING WITCH HUNT BROUGHT ON BY CORRUPT JOE BIDEN, THE DOJ, DERANGED JACK SMITH, AND THEIR RADICAL LEFT, MARXIST THUGS…” --Donald Trump, June 15, 2023 The notion that presidents—and, for that matter, the rest of the federal government—must preserve their records is of recent vintage. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 4:30 am by Matrix Law
This regime was designed to grant leave to remain to high-net-worth individuals making a substantial financial contribution to the UK. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
The District Court granted summary judgment for AWF on its assertion of “fair use”, but the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 9:04 pm by Scott McKeown
Examples of parties with substantial relationships may include: A party’s co-defendant in district court (see Valve Corp. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 9:04 pm by Scott McKeown
Examples of parties with substantial relationships may include: A party’s co-defendant in district court (see Valve Corp. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 2:11 pm by Katherine Pompilio
Anna Bower (June 14, 2023) A Primer on the Silent Witness Rule and United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 12:00 pm by Phil Dixon
Complaint adequately pled a Fourteenth Amendment violation for deliberate indifference to a pretrial detainee’s medical needs and should not have been dismissed Stevens v. [read post]
Data Subject Rights – Similar to other state privacy laws, the TDPSA includes five basic consumer rights: (i) Right to Access, (ii) Right to Correct, (iii) Right to Delete, (iv) Portability, and (v) Right to Opt Out (of targeted advertising, sale of personal data, and/or profiling). [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 9:58 am by Jim Soong
  The recent past provides a lesson: What if decisions almost ten years ago about whether to seek patent protection on vital software innovations relied solely on the Patent Office’s first positions on Alice Corp. v. [read post]
., that the other state must grant a similar credit against Louisiana individual income tax) is eliminated. [read post]