Search for: "I v. B" Results 5341 - 5360 of 24,578
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2014, 7:16 am
The Judge said, among other things, that (i) declaring code was not protectable and that (ii) although the overall structure of Oracle’s API packages was creative, original, and “resembles a taxonomy”, it was nonetheless “a command structure, a system or method of operation that is not entitled to copyright protection under Section 102(b) of the Copyright Act”. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 4:38 am by David Vasella
Die verlangte Änderung des Pflichtenhefts würde deshalb die Qualität des Produkts gefährden, und verstiesse deshalb gegen GUB/GGA-V 3 I b und damit auch gegen Art. 6 Abs. 1. [read post]
15 May 2009, 9:32 am
Sanctions in medical-malpractice suit even after nonsuit Frances B. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 4:59 pm by INFORRM
Bărbulescu v Romania On 3 July 2007 Mr Bărbulescu’s employer sent a notice to all employees prohibiting personal use of the Internet whilst at work. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 9:55 am by Eric
The plaintiff alleges violations of the Lanham Act, California's false advertising law (B&P 17500) and other claims. [read post]
31 May 2011, 2:13 pm
(B) In any parking zone that is restricted as to the length of time parking is permitted as indicated by a sign erected pursuant to a local ordinance. [read post]