Search for: "IN RE THE RULES OF CONTINUING LEGAL" Results 5341 - 5360 of 15,748
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2019, 6:03 am
In The IPKat team: arrivals, farewells, and news, PermaKat Merpel introduces the new Kats and says goodbye to those Kats who will not continue with the blog. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 5:32 am by Cory Doctorow
In the time since, Facebook has continued to be rocked by scandals: privacy breaches, livestreamed terrorist attacks, harassment, and more. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 7:52 am by MBettman
In re D.S., 2016-Ohio-1027 (It is not a due process violation to impose upon a juvenile registration and notification requirements that extend beyond the age of 18 or 21.) [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 3:38 am by SHG
It’s no different here than where you’re t-boned by an unemployed driver without insurance. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 2:00 am by Ben
 Perry's legal team argued that this was a very common musical phrase that couldn't possibly be protected by copyright. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 11:19 am by Giles Peaker
And yes, res judicata does include First Tier Tribunal proceedings. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 4:30 am by SHG
  and (2)  “active resistance” should not be a condition for legal protection. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 12:58 pm by Beth Graham
”  The Fifth Circuit continued by stating: And even putting aside the exception clauses, none of these provisions speak with any specificity to the particular matter of class arbitrations. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 6:31 am by Joel R. Brandes
The court concluded that the ICPC process had to be completed and the placement approved prior to granting the father custody as the child was in the legal custody of the Commissioner of Social Services, and subject to the continuing jurisdiction of Family Court. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 2:04 pm by Christopher Tyner
Continuing our new practice of posting North Carolina appellate court case summaries to the blog, this post provides summaries of the North Carolina Court of Appeals opinions published on August 6, 2019. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 9:23 am by Cannabis Law Group
This is likely to continue despite a turning tide of state-level legalization, so long as the drug remains illegal under federal law. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 8:24 am by David Leffler
One situation that does not fit in with the factors above is the issue of re-applications and re-filings. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 7:00 am by Joe
Does this, then, mean that we’re closer to having it declare that such currency can be used as legal tender? [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 10:31 pm
So the pawned property is protected only if it continues to be yours and has not legally become the pawnbroker's as of the moment of your bankruptcy filing. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 4:40 am by Barry Sookman
Our privacy framework should be “designed to ensure the continued free flow of personal information across borders while establishing meaningful protection for privacy and security of personal information. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 7:41 pm by Norma Duenas
So the pawned property is protected only if it continues to be yours and has not legally become the pawnbroker’s as of the moment of your bankruptcy filing. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 5:12 am by opadmin
This rule is too vague to count on to protect your property when facing repossession. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 5:12 am by opadmin
This rule is too vague to count on to protect your property when facing repossession. [read post]