Search for: "In Re: Designation of Judges"
Results 5341 - 5360
of 9,823
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2014, 3:06 am
In re Tigerland-Foxland Ltd., Serial No. 85130889 (July 23, 2014) [not precedential]. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 12:39 pm
If you have one of the recalled Remington rifles, you’re certainly not alone. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 1:36 am
Looking at the marks in their entireties, the Board found the design portions to be very different overall. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 10:14 am
So is this, which just happens to be something Owen (well, yeah, we’re on a first-name basis; his email said, “Dear Ron,” didn’t it?) [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:00 am
Among other things, the report found faults with Jensen Farms’ facility design, equipment design and post-harvest practices[14]. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 4:31 am
Of course, everyone believes they’re entitled to an opinion on such matters, because this is America and knowledge is a highly over-rated commodity. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 10:01 pm
Among other things, the report found faults with Jensen Farms’ facility design, equipment design and post-harvest practices[14]. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 8:10 am
As a Second Circuit judge put it: “The government came up with a crime, provided the means, and removed all relevant obstacles. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 6:00 am
Because co-ownership and fair use are expensive to prove (only a judge or arbitrator can decide), many graphic and web designers deal with these issues in their contracts by including a "portfolio provision" or by retaining non-exclusive rights for certain design elements. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 5:28 am
[Refusal to register BARLEY POWER GREEN SUPREME and Design shown below, for "dietary supplements also containing organically grown barley plants" [BARLEY disclaimed] in view of the registered mark GREEN SUPREME for "vitamin and mineral supplements, dietary supplements with herbs and natural ingredients"].In re In re MAC Mode GmbH & Co. [read post]
20 Jul 2014, 5:38 pm
… We’re the good guys. [read post]
20 Jul 2014, 4:44 am
Not that we’re not sufficiently interested in the “life of the mind,” but we’re tainted by experience. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:33 am
If so, then the only remaining question would be whether such a denial of exemptions is the “least restrictive manner” of furthering those compelling interests.For purpose of my hypo, remember, we’re assuming that the government has tried and failed to develop any purely regulatory solution that both satisfies the employer’s religious objection and at the same time furthers the government’s compelling interests. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 10:57 am
A long analysis of this subject was done by Justice Lebedeff in In Re Entertainment Partners Group, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 7:34 am
(There is no mention of any attempt to rehabilitate the witness by a re-direct examination.) [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 9:34 pm
The next step is going to be a PTAB hearing.All three filings with the PTAB are attached to Samsung's notice (just in case you're interested in the details): 14-07-15 Samsung Notice Re. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 4:00 am
It introduced us to user-friendly computing, including visual interfaces, multimedia and an early form of mobile computing as it was designed to be luggable. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 4:45 pm
In BC, you’re best bet is doubling up your yoga mat and hoping you hit the curb right. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 5:30 am
In my experience, when dealing with competent, professional opposing counsel they will recognize at once your right to adjourn the deposition and you can usually secure an oral stipulation on the record to the effect of "counsel, can we agree that this deposition will be designated as Volume I, and I can re-notice your client's deposition on a later date? [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 4:50 am
Prosecutors and Judges often wonder why clients facing ten years in prison balk at a reduced offer of five or three? [read post]
