Search for: "In re: Adams" Results 5341 - 5360 of 6,371
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2013, 5:16 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The agreement further provided for supervised visitation and a mechanism for the child and father to re-establish their relationship. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 6:33 pm by Adam Zimmerman
    See, e.g., In re Visa Check/Mastercard Antitrust Litigation, No. [read post]
31 May 2024, 10:44 am by Dennis Crouch
Adam Prucka, a law student at Columbia, provides a detailed analysis of why he believes the proposed rule exceeds the USPTO’s rulemaking authority under 35 U.S.C. 2(b)(2)(A). [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 10:48 pm by Riann Winget
WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK In a recent article in the Yale Journal on Regulation, Aneil Kovvali of the Indiana University Maurer School of Law and Joshua C. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 5:47 am by Russ Bensing
I’ve harped about the penurious compensation for counsel appointed to represent indigent defendants here in Cuyahoga County, but we’re living in the lap of luxury compared to our counterparts in Alabama. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
Iowa Lieutenant Governor Adam Gregg called the deal “a win for Iowa producers, and the world-class products we can provide. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 4:03 am by SHG
The cops outside know they’re cops, but how would he know? [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 3:37 am by Russ Bensing
  The latter, discussed here, held that the Adam Walsh Act classifications couldn’t be applied retroactively to people who committed their crimes before its effective date of January 1, 2008. [read post]
24 May 2012, 1:46 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
Adam Wagner has compared  the prisoner voting issue to a ping-pong ball in a wind tunnel, noting that ‘the ball is now back on the UK’s side of the table’. [read post]
We must all remain vigilant and armed with the truth so we're prepared when the next one comes along. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
Richard Re has this blog’s argument analysis. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the justices will decide next term whether a provision of the federal sex-offender act violates the nondelegation doctrine, arguing that “the current intelligible principle standard for governing congressional re-delegations of its legislative power lacks a basis in the text and original meaning of the Constitution, [and] that it frustrates the democratic accountability of Congress, and leads to the violation of individual rights. [read post]
To better understand how this applies to your organization, contact Kimi Gordy, Adam Cohen, or your BakerHostetler attorney. [read post]