Search for: "In re A. V." Results 5341 - 5360 of 62,920
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2022, 10:57 am by Michael Ehline
Furthermore, if testing has already been done, then the NHTSA will re-do the entire process to determine if those changes have had any impact on its safety features. [read post]
2 Jul 2022, 5:21 am by SHG
Between the breakdown of norms and the “must win at any price” approach to every controversial issue, we’re watching imaginative approaches to problems that are poorly thought out, poorly executed and given little to no concern for how much they violate constitutional rights. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 3:08 pm by SCOTUStalk
 Please tell us your first name and where you’re calling from. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 8:03 am by Florian Mueller
Depending on the outcome of the judicial proceedings, that might change.The South Korean situation is more transparent because we're talking about a law--the Telecommunication Business Act--and an implementation guideline--the Korea Communications Commission's (KCC) related Enforcement Decree. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 7:32 am
" Not only is it not colloquial or ordinary legal jargon to speak of "legalizing a right," you can't tell what specific federal law they're talking about. [read post]
In particular, we were skeptical that Trump’s speech would satisfy the stringent requirement of Brandenburg v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:03 pm by Zoe Stern
Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, overturned Roe v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:40 am by Roy Black
  UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Criminal Action No. 20-10177-PBS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. [read post]