Search for: "J. Eddings" Results 5341 - 5360 of 6,777
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jul 2009, 7:42 am by Paul Daniel Marks
The good thing about gap coverage is that there is a limited number of programs from which to choose - I think it's "A" through "J," with increasing levels of benefits as you move down the list. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 5:37 am by Russell Knight
“[J]udgments recovered in any court shall draw interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of the judgment until satisfied” 735 ILCS 5/2-1303 Failure to pay court ordered child support has possible criminal penalties. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 3:50 pm by Eugene Volokh
Wexler was not an adequate representative of the class; the district court (Block, J.) granted the motion. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 12:15 am by Tessa Shepperson
Ed] The Newham Council affair I was reminded of Leeds when reading this week, the varying opinions on Newham council’s attempt to export their benefit tenants to Stoke. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 12:18 pm by Kevin Crandall
A final decision, Judge Gorsuch reasoned, dissociates the court from the case and ends the litigation on the merits, while the order withdrawing a settlement approval does “[j]ust the opposite: the order ensures litigation on the merits will continue in the district court. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 2:05 pm
" Biddle vigorously opposed the prosecution of dissenters, the mass detention of enemy aliens, J. [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 4:28 pm by Betsy McKenzie
Smith, Dir. of Scholarly Communications, Duke University, Peter J. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 11:19 am by Ray Dowd
  The argument is really worth watching, kudos to the judge who analogizes the case to the "pawn shop" scenario.The Ninth Circuit decision below:Art Litigation: Cassirer v Kingdom of Spain - Camille Pissarro  Purchase Copyright Litigation Handbook from West here   tweetmeme_source = 'raydowd'; Copyright Litigation Handbook (West 5th Ed. 2010) by Raymond J. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 7:54 am by John Elwood
”  The Court criticized those tests in strong terms, saying they “disregard[ed] . . . the presumption against extraterritoriality. [read post]