Search for: "Kennedy v. State"
Results 5341 - 5360
of 8,225
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2011, 12:41 pm
The Court thus was left with a troubling question: can it decide the case before it: Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 11:13 am
Given the implications of the rule for which the petitioner in Martinez v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 6:55 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 6:29 pm
The oral argument transcript in Maples v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 1:09 pm
The new guidance rules, however, are based upon Justice Kennedy's concurrence opinion in Rapanos, in which he stated that the CWA covers waters that "significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity" of navigable waterways. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 4:05 am
(See prior posting).Sherman v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 8:42 pm
Unlike the vague and even fictional consent espoused by thinkers such as Justice Kennedy, and denigrated by critics who bemoan its limitations, tribal consent theory should be explored and integrated in federal Indian law. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 10:38 am
It's true that Justice Kennedy's opinion in Lawrence does not use the magic words "fundamental right" (except in discussing Bowers v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 6:35 am
But given that Gonzales v. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 3:52 pm
Office of the State's Attorney of Cooke County. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 5:36 pm
(The fifth vote to halt the trial came from Justice Kennedy, who felt that the conspiracy issue should be deferred until a completed trial record was before the Court. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 9:16 am
But if Douglas v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 2:17 pm
This latest stage of the litigation places the constitutional issue front and center.United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 12:21 pm
As part of the Fall Meeting of the ABA's Section of State & Local Government Law in Tucson, on Thursday, September 22, I was on a panel discussing the Supreme Court's recent decision in Nevada Commission on Ethics v. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 1:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 12:08 pm
Since the case law is split largely based on fact sensitive issues, we’ll lead with one where we think the court got it right -- Kennedy v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 5:57 am
Palmer, who was part of the four-to-three majority ruling in favor of the city in the eminent domain case Kelo v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 12:52 pm
State Bar of Arizona. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 11:37 am
Wal-Mart v. [read post]
