Search for: "Light v. State Bar"
Results 5341 - 5360
of 5,598
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2008, 10:45 am
The DCC represents the founders reaction to overreaching by individual states... it prohibits discrimination aimed directly at interstate commerce and bars state regulations that, although facially nondiscriminatory, unduly burden interstate commerce [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 6:00 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 7:19 pm
Mordenti v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 10:04 am
State of Indiana (NFP) David Dolch v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 8:53 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 11:04 pm
In Preston v. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 6:45 am
Aug. 31, 2006), and Congress Construction Co., Inc. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 11:00 am
That was the apparent question in CALPERS v. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 8:29 am
" Buckman Co. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 4:14 am
The district court rejected this argument finding it “completely untenable” in light of Steiner v. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 12:59 am
"
United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 7:33 pm
Ohio; Cox v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 1:51 am
"
United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 8:11 am
Brown, No. 05-5462 Judgment resentencing defendant to 84 months' imprisonment in light of his prior state-law conviction of third-degree burglary, considered as a crime of violence, and his possession of firearms whose serial numbers had been obliterated, is affirmed over claims that the district court erred in: 1) increasing defendant's offense level; and 2) his sentence is unreasonable. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 7:42 am
U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals, January 31, 2008 State of NC v. [read post]
2 Feb 2008, 9:58 am
This originally pro se mandamus petition was referred by the Court to the State Bar’s pro bono program. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 11:03 pm
Callahan's claim is barred by a twoyearstatute of limitation. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 12:55 pm
His application (Callahan v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Cain, No. 07-30021 'Dismissal of a 28 U.S.C. section 2254 petition brought by a petitioner convicted of cocaine possession and sentenced to forty years in prison as a third-time felony offender is affirmed over claims of error regarding: 1) whether a state court's determination that there was a valid waiver of counsel as to one of petitioner's predicate offenses was unreasonable in light of the evidence presented in the state court proceeding, and, if so,… [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 6:30 am
Callahan v. [read post]
