Search for: "Lively v. State" Results 5341 - 5360 of 29,017
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2020, 6:00 am by Jane Turner
You could ask about anything with the debates being quite lively. [read post]
The rights of third-country nationals migrating to the EU have largely been constructed under the terms of Part Three, Title V, Chapter 3 TFEU, particularly arts 78-79 thereof. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 9:06 pm by Series of Essays
COVID-19 and Access to Medical Care in the United States May 26, 2020 | Allison K. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 7:45 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The fourth was also introduced last year, in Yenovkian v. [read post]
25 Dec 2020, 9:03 pm by Hannah Pugh
In a note published in the New York University Law Review, Kenyon critiques Alt v. [read post]
25 Dec 2020, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Friends, if the Supreme Court reforms qualified immunity anytime soon, the history books will say the Court first showed its hand this month in Tanzin v. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 10:07 pm by Kluwer Patent blogger
The article discusses the divergences between various states in their interpretation of CJEU jurisprudence and the importance of the – then – upcoming judgment of the UK Supreme Court in Unwired Planet v Huawei. [read post]
Extension of Emergency State Staffing Flexibility State unemployment offices have temporary, emergency authority to use nonmerit staff through March 14, 2021. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 12:46 pm by Giles Peaker
She is at risk of unintentional self-neglect if she is not supported with daily living activities. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 9:17 am by Giles Peaker
She was living with her mother in a one bedroom flat. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 3:15 pm by Marta Belcher
 Financial records contain a trove of sensitive information about people’s personal lives, beliefs, and affiliations. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am by Phil Dixon
(1) Despite the State’s repeated use of “moped” to describe the defendant’s vehicle, sufficient evidence existed to establish that the defendant’s vehicle met the statutory definition of “motor vehicle”; (2) New trial required where trial court plainly erred in failing to instruct the jury on the definition of “motor vehicle” State v. [read post]