Search for: "MATTER OF RULES OF EVIDENCE" Results 5341 - 5360 of 42,348
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Bedoya, In the Matter of JAB Consumer Fund/SAGE Veterinary Partners, Commission File No. 2110140 (June 13, 2022). [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm by Jon May
Gorsuch, A Republic If You Can Keep It 217 (2019).But none of these reasons matter if the case involves a constitutional right that was decided wrongly. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 3:23 pm by Russell Knight
File Rule 219 motions to exclude evidence for any failure to produce discovery. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 8:20 am by Professor Alberto Bernabe
  However, this might not prevent the application of other applicable laws related to discrimination.- the exceptions also recognize circumstances in which a lawyer may not be disciplined for expressing their views on matters of public concern.Overall, the newly adopted rule in New York is an improvement over versions of the rule I have seen elsewhere, but I confess I have not seen all of them. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 5:10 am by Simon Lester
One part of the answer seems to be about gathering evidence, and I'm sympathetic to that problem, although I think DSU Article 13 can help here. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 12:01 am by Hanlon Law, PA
The United States Supreme Court issued a ruling clarifying what evidence is needed to convict a doctor of disbursing controlled substances in an unauthorized matter in violation of the Act. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 12:01 am by Hanlon Law, PA
The United States Supreme Court issued a ruling clarifying what evidence is needed to convict a doctor of disbursing controlled substances in an unauthorized matter in violation of the Act. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 3:35 pm by Russell Knight
The multitude of laws that affect these matters are contained in the statute, case law and various procedural rules established by the Illinois Supreme Court and the local Trial Court supervising your divorce case. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 12:55 pm by admin
It does not matter whether you are guilty of driving under the influence. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 5:46 am by Russell Knight
When a section 2-1401 petition is premised on newly discovered evidence, “the petitioner must show the new evidence was not known to [him or] her at the time of the proceeding and could not have been discovered by the petitioner with the exercise of reasonable diligence. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:08 pm by Public Employment Law Press
" In light of the foregoing, and given that no contrary medical opinions were presented, the Board's factual determination that claimant suffered from an occupational disease resulting from repetitive stress is supported by substantial evidence and will not be disturbed (see Matter of Garcia v MCI Interiors, Inc., 158 AD3d 907, 908 [2018]; Matter of Curtis v Xerox, 66 AD3d 1106, 1108 [2009]). [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:08 pm by Public Employment Law Press
" In light of the foregoing, and given that no contrary medical opinions were presented, the Board's factual determination that claimant suffered from an occupational disease resulting from repetitive stress is supported by substantial evidence and will not be disturbed (see Matter of Garcia v MCI Interiors, Inc., 158 AD3d 907, 908 [2018]; Matter of Curtis v Xerox, 66 AD3d 1106, 1108 [2009]). [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:07 pm by Public Employment Law Press
As such, substantial evidence supports the Board's conclusion that claimant did not and could not comply with the reporting requirements from Egypt (see Labor Law § 596; 12 NYCRR 473.1, 473.2, 473.3; Matter of Inatomi [Commissioner of Labor], 116 AD3d 1332, 1333 [2014]). [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:07 pm by Public Employment Law Press
As such, substantial evidence supports the Board's conclusion that claimant did not and could not comply with the reporting requirements from Egypt (see Labor Law § 596; 12 NYCRR 473.1, 473.2, 473.3; Matter of Inatomi [Commissioner of Labor], 116 AD3d 1332, 1333 [2014]). [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:06 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Consequently, as there was no medical evidence establishing a recognizable link between claimant's injuries and repetitive movements associated with her work activities, substantial evidence supports the Board's determination that claimant did not establish that she sustained a causally-related occupational disease (see Matter of Patalan v PAL Envtl., 202 AD3d at 1253; Matter of Barker v New York City Police Dept., 176 AD3d at 1272-1273; Matter… [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:06 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Consequently, as there was no medical evidence establishing a recognizable link between claimant's injuries and repetitive movements associated with her work activities, substantial evidence supports the Board's determination that claimant did not establish that she sustained a causally-related occupational disease (see Matter of Patalan v PAL Envtl., 202 AD3d at 1253; Matter of Barker v New York City Police Dept., 176 AD3d at 1272-1273; Matter… [read post]