Search for: "Mark C. Good"
Results 5341 - 5360
of 5,884
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2009, 9:30 am
While this Kat is rather flattered that her Adword question made it into so many articles, she feels that this point needed to be clarified:"Does the use of a third party's trade mark as a keyword/Adword on identical goods/services constitute trade mark infringement under the Directive? [read post]
13 May 2009, 12:53 pm
(c) I read this document from start to finish so I could write this. [read post]
13 May 2009, 7:55 am
The other nephew - Robert C. [read post]
12 May 2009, 1:31 pm
Demleitner, Terms of Imprisonment: Treating the Noncitizen Offender Equally Dora Schriro, Is Good Time a Good Idea? [read post]
11 May 2009, 9:50 am
In the event that the trade marks have a reputation, may the proprietor oppose such use under Article 5(2) of the directive and Article 9(1)(c) of the regulation? [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:08 am
§ 20-3-130(C) (Supp. 2008). [read post]
8 May 2009, 4:00 am
P. 37(c) and 26(e)(2), and it noted that Grande made no claim that new information was discovered. [read post]
6 May 2009, 8:57 am
C. [read post]
5 May 2009, 9:09 am
Although she gets high marks for sass and biographical appeal -- not insignificant qualities -- Rosen reports that some have raised doubts about her strength on the merits. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:06 am
See Testimony of John C. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:00 am
(Spicy IP) Defining ‘literary works’ for copyright protection (International Law Office) Drafting and interpretation of patent claims (IP Frontline) Israel Israel Patent Office accepts lacks jurisdiction and rules anyway: Karl Storz GmbH & Co v Bausch and Lomb (The IP Factor) Economist report ranks Israel 10th in terms of innovation (The IP Factor) Mauritius Mauritius launches IP sensitivity drive (Afro-IP) Netherlands Presiding Judge of… [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 11:47 am
It’s not all good, of course. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 2:06 am
Goodman has been represented by Alan C. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 5:47 am
Garcia C. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 4:44 pm
Food & Drug Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 5:10 pm
This is a panel, moderated by Thomas C. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 7:55 am
I knew you were.UPDATE:Some have commented and emailed regarding the interpretation (above) of Treasury notice 2009-27, indicating perhaps Conexis missed the mark. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 6:49 am
Good morning. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 3:30 am
Ergo, the Board affirmed this refusal.Mutilation: Under Rule 2.51(a), the mark shown on the application drawing must be a "substantially exact representation of the mark as used on or in connection with the goods and/or services. [read post]
