Search for: "Matter of Adoption of Doe"
Results 5341 - 5360
of 19,701
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2017, 3:53 am
They are all based on Manocherian’s duties to Langham as its “Tax Matters Partner”. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 4:55 pm
In exceptional cases, this ordinary duty has been limited by judges as a matter of law. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 4:15 am
Further, said the court, Longton's "assertion that the subsequent investigation of [the individual] was lackluster, even if true, does not provide an after-the-fact justification for his insubordination. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 4:13 am
As trade secret use and trade secret misappropriation increase in the digital age, so too does trade secret litigation. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 10:09 pm
This was demonstrated recently in a ruling issued in a New York medical malpractice matter in which the court declined to adopt the defendant hospital’s assertion that it was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 4:29 pm
A New Jersey court adopted with the reasoning of the ALJ on appeal. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 3:43 am
Further, said the court, Longton’s “assertion that the subsequent investigation of [the individual] was lackluster, even if true, does not provide an after-the-fact justification for his insubordination. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 12:55 am
Here, the policy does not apparently even attempt to limit the definition of "related" to the extent that it was limited in Matter of Nationwide Mut. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 11:49 am
What test should the court adopt to determine whether a computer-implemented invention is a patent ineligible “abstract idea”; and when, if ever, does the presence of a computer in a claim lend patent eligibility to an otherwise patent-ineligible idea? [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 8:49 am
Unfortunately as previously discussed the McLendon does not satisfy the goal of stability. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 8:49 am
Unfortunately as previously discussed the McLendon does not satisfy the goal of stability. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 9:00 am
Florida has adopted a comparative fault system. [read post]
28 May 2010, 4:15 am
”The Court of Appeals, citing Matter of Pell v Board of Education, 34 NY2d 222, disagreed, holding that imposing the penalty of demoting Torrance to a non-supervisory position “does not shock the judicial conscience,” and reversed the Appellate Division’s ruling.Further, the Court of Appeals said that the Appellate Division “has no discretionary authority or interest of justice jurisdiction in this CPLR article 78 proceeding to review the penalty… [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 4:05 am
While we have not ruled as to whether the Clerk would have had standing, we have held that a deputy clerk does not. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 3:51 am
(Fn. 23, e.g.: “Therefore, although invited to do so by several amici, we decline to adopt a broad exclusion over software or any other such category of subject matter beyond the exclusion of claims drawn to fundamental principles set forth by the Supreme Court. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 11:32 am
A federal scheme adopted from the latter, distinctly federal, perspective would fall within the circumscribed scope of the general trade and commerce power. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 9:24 am
Why does it still upset people who seeor hear about it? [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 3:10 am
I, however, lean towards finding the provision unconstitutional, particularly as applied to the group “The Slants,” who have adopted the name to “take ownership” of anti-Asian stereotypes. [read post]
19 May 2007, 4:33 am
A theory that rejects delegation to the future does not function well as basic law because it misunderstands why constitutional adopters adopt open-textured language; it cannot operate as higher law because it so distrusts aspirationalism. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 2:46 pm
” As a threshold matter, the report asserts that disparate impact claims are not cognizable under the ECOA because the ECOA does not contain “results-oriented language” like that which the Supreme Court relied upon in holding that disparate impact claims are cognizable under the Fair Housing Act (“FHA”). [read post]
