Search for: "People v J." Results 5341 - 5360 of 7,245
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2011, 5:48 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Comparing WTO Panelists and ICSID Arbitrators: The Creation of International Legal Fields Jose Augusto Fontoura Costa Abstract:      Who are people who make the decisions in trade and investment dispute settlement systems? [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:48 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Comparing WTO Panelists and ICSID Arbitrators: The Creation of International Legal Fields Jose Augusto Fontoura Costa Abstract:      Who are people who make the decisions in trade and investment dispute settlement systems? [read post]
31 May 2011, 11:30 pm by Michael Scutt
 As many people know, the maximum compensatory award that can be made for unfair dismissal by an Employment Tribunal is currently £68,400 (less at the time Ms Shoesmith was dismissed). [read post]
30 May 2011, 9:26 am by INFORRM
Hutcheson (formerly known as “KGM”) v News Group Newspapers, heard 24 May 2011 (Master of the Rolls, Etherton and Gross LJJ) Caplin v Associated Newspapers Ltd, heard 26 May 2011 (Sharp J) [read post]
27 May 2011, 7:32 am by Dan Markel
Mannheimer (Northern Kentucky University) Retributive Justice: 4 Questions *Dan Markel (Florida State University) Total Retribution *Meghan J. [read post]
24 May 2011, 12:26 am by Orin Kerr
He became a judge on the New York Court of Appeals, and he wrote at least one opinion that touched on it, People v. [read post]
22 May 2011, 10:13 pm by Jeff Gamso
  They're in the business of trying to put people behind bars.So they did a test. [read post]
22 May 2011, 5:01 pm by INFORRM
Modi v Clarke and International Management Group (UK) Ltd v Clarke, heard 13 and 16 May 2011 (Tugendhat J) Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Ltd heard 18 May 2011 (Tugendhat J) [read post]
22 May 2011, 6:14 am by Charon QC
CTB -v- Twitter, Inc. and Persons Unknown (Case No. [read post]
22 May 2011, 4:34 am by The Legal Blog
Union of India & Ors. 2006 (7) SCC 1, the expression "ordinary residence" as used in the Representation of People Act, 1950 fell for interpretation. [read post]