Search for: "President v. State" Results 5341 - 5360 of 22,895
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2008, 12:40 am
Employer found to have unlawfully discriminated against employee because of age to pay back salary and an award for mental anguish and humiliationMatter of New York State Tug Hill Commn. v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 2008 NY Slip Op 05110, Decided on June 6, 2008, Appellate Division, Fourth Department Clark Waring Blackburn, Jr., was terminated from his position by Tug Hill in the course of "a reorganization. [read post]
16 Jan 2025, 8:35 am by Rose Hughes
Yet the board stated that any amendment of the description should not add matter to the application as filed, Art 123(2) EPC. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 9:22 am by Herrman & Herrman, P.L.L.C.
President Trump argued it was “squarely within the scope of Presidential authority under the INA” The Supreme Court agreed. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 9:50 am by Steven Eversole
State – Prior Bad Acts Under Rule 404, Feb. 17, 2015, Birmingham DUI Defense Lawyer Blog [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
To state the obvious, no emergency exists. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 6:50 am by Erin Miller
Florida and Sullivan v. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 9:07 am by Michael D. Thompson
By Aaron Olsen The United States Supreme Court declined to review the Second Circuit’s decision in Irizarry v. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Finally, under the circumstances of this case, the Appellate Division concluded that the penalty of dismissal from SUNY Albany imposed on Petitioner was not disproportionate to the offense, citing Lampert v State Univ. of N.Y. at Albany, 116 AD3d 1292, leave to appeal denied, 23 NY3d 908. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 8:46 am
As Justice Brandeis noted, in his famous dissent in New State Ice Co. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:59 pm by Ilya Somin
In a recent post at the Originalism Blog, he skewers the Supreme Court's recent ruling in Trump v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 2:55 am by Scott Bomboy
United States Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall’s ruling in the famous Marbury v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 11:30 pm by Theodore Ruger
 Of course, given national and state level opposition to the ACA, such permanent entrenchment that the President craves is far from assured. [read post]