Search for: "S. Sherman"
Results 5341 - 5360
of 5,995
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2008, 3:07 pm
" And Mark Sherman of The Associated Press has a report headlined "High Court: Gitmo detainees have rights in court. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 5:36 pm
For those of you who are Kentucky sports fans, or less likely Antitrust fans, you may be interested in yesterday's decision by the Sixth Circuit in Claude Bassett's antitrust case against the NCAA and the U.K. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 5:05 pm
If a state specific book does not exist in your state, general sample agreements may also be found in a number of other books like Ed Sherman’s Make Any Divorce Better! [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 9:39 pm
And this Court has expressly recognized that the acquisition of monopoly power through fraud on a governmental entity - but not on the plaintiff - provides a basis for recovery of treble damages under the Sherman Act. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 6:13 pm
The court of appeals emphasized that the bright-line rule left it with no choice but to affirm the district court’s decision to dismiss Bamberg’s claims. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 6:13 pm
The court of appeals emphasized that the bright-line rule left it with no choice but to affirm the district court’s decision to dismiss Bamberg’s claims. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 8:11 pm
The Associated Press is reporting: Mark Sherman reports that "Supreme Court justices sell stocks in 2007. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 10:08 pm
Sherman in his Texas State & Local Tax Law Blog High profile Supreme Court hearings scheduled in Las Vegas for June 13 - Las Vegas attorney Tami Cowden of Kummer Kaempfer at her blog, Appealing in Nevada Latest bankruptcy statistics, mortgage and foreclosure updates - Atlanta lawyer Scott Riddle in his Georgia Bankruptcy Law Blog How do you keep clients informed? [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 2:46 pm
(in support of the petition) Brief amicus curiae of United States (recommending denial of certiorari) __________________ Docket: 07-512 Case name: Pacific Bell Telephone Co., dba AT&T California v. linkLine Communications Issue: Whether Section 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act permits a "price squeeze" claim if the defendant has no duty to deal. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 1:19 pm
[N-Data][Zura’s Comments] Three important cases on this issue: US v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 3:00 pm
Sherman in his Texas State & Local Tax Law Blog What consumers of ADR want from their mediators - New Jersey lawyer Richard J. [read post]
30 May 2008, 3:32 pm
"You can't create a whole new record in federal court if you haven't presented it in state court," she told Moore's lawyer, Sherman attorney Scott Smith. [read post]
30 May 2008, 3:16 am
The Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, which consists of 12 sovereign nations, including Hugo Chavez's Venezuela and Ayatollah Khameini's Iran. [read post]
29 May 2008, 11:00 pm
(Sherman v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 1:11 pm
His article contains a short summary of this year's patent verdicts to date, noting that while Boston Scientific's losses were initially against the local trend of defense verdicts in patent cases, they're consistent with the more recent trend of plaintiffs rebounding with wins in Marshall and Lufkins after earlier losses in Sherman and Marshall. [read post]
29 May 2008, 4:54 am
Plaintiff’s theory was that this agreement constituted a “per se market allocation” agreement in violation of the Sherman Act. [read post]
28 May 2008, 6:47 pm
Mark Sherman of the Associated Press on yesterday's Supreme Court decision adopting broad leeway for employees to file retaliation claims in discrimination suits, even though the statute is silent on the subject (via Taranto, whose emphasis is added): In two... [read post]
27 May 2008, 10:00 pm
Note: This week's post was written by Matt Sherman, Director of Marketing & Business Development at Welsh & Katz, a mid-sized intellectual property firm. [read post]
27 May 2008, 6:55 pm
I've recently been reading Rachel Sherman's book Class Acts: Service and Inequality in Luxury Hotels. [read post]
23 May 2008, 8:50 am
In its brief, the Solicitor General states that Section 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act does not permit the type of “price-squeeze” claim at issue in the case, and that the ruling below is contrary to the Court’s 2004 opinion in Verizon Communications v. [read post]
