Search for: "Samsung"
Results 5341 - 5360
of 6,717
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2014, 10:07 am
Many businesses, particularly large tech companies like Facebook and Samsung, put considerable resources into designing office layouts and choosing tools and gadgets. [read post]
29 Apr 2017, 3:11 am
Also, I still haven't forgotten that Apple once collected roughly half a billion dollars from Samsung on procedurally proper but, in my personal view, unfair grounds in 2015 (I was the lone voice criticizing Apple for it). [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 2:05 pm
All companies involved in mobile communications from the network layer (AT&T, T-Mobile, Verizon, etc.) to the hardware layer (Qualcomm, Samsung, Intel), to the software layer (Apple, Google) need to work together to ensure that our cellular infrastructure is safe, secure, and private from attacks by spys, criminals, and rogue law enforcement. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 6:12 am
| Napp v Dr Reddy's and Sandoz.Never too late 86 [week ending on Sunday 6 March] – Comic Enterprises Ltd v Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation [2016] EWCA Civ 41 | The IPKat team: news, new arrivals and farewells | CJEU in Shoe Branding Europe BVBA v Adidas and OHIM | World IP day | Advocate General's opinion in Henrik Saugmandsgaard Øe in Austro-Mechana | EPO v trade union | OLG Munich on YouTube liability | UPC… [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 7:38 am
The fairly heated discussion on the IPKat also suggested that sponsor Samsung might be the owner, having possibly directed Ellen to arrange the shot on the S5 mobile phone as a publicity stunt, although our very own John Enser opines "Surely the answer is that anyone who goes anywhere near the Oscars stage will have signed a release handing over all their rights to the Academy - so irrespective of who was the first owner, it is now owned by the Academy?". [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 11:25 pm
Two of them are good news for Ericsson, while Apple has avoided an early-stage dismissal of its "patent misuse" defense:Ericsson can now amend its infringement contentions (as well as its technical domestic industry contentions, which involve the same questions as infringement, but not with respect to Apple's products--it's actually about what Ericsson's licensee Samsung does in the U.S. market). [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 4:01 pm
Once upon a time, international IP litigation was the province of the trade mark lawyer (it took more than a century, and far more than a hundred instances of litigation, before the wasteful and ultimately futile "Battle of the Buds" faded away) -- but now the Herculean struggles between Apple and Samsung appear to have replaced trade marks with patents as the international must-sue accessory. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 2:00 am
The now infamous (thanks to Apple v Samsung) Judge Lucy Koh who sat on the committee hoped that the new order "will help shape the discussion and scope of litigation, even if it is not outright adopted verbatim". [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 1:22 am
Through the "Patentgate" scandal it came to light that Nokia and Samsung are negotiating a patent license deal.If you'd like to be updated on the smartphone patent disputes and other intellectual property matters I cover, please subscribe to my RSS feed (in the right-hand column) and/or follow me on Twitter @FOSSpatents and Google+.Follow @FOSSpatents Share with other professionals via LinkedIn: Share| [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 9:53 am
Some companies, such as Samsung, licensed the former Bosch patents from their original assignee.Earlier this year it appeared that Nokia and IPCom were close to a settlement, but they hit an impasse mentioned in a May 2013 UK ruling.Rumor has it that IPCom is also suing Apple. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:48 am
Imagine, for a moment, that instead of describing Intellectual Ventures, the quotes referred to a company such as IBM or Samsung. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 12:40 pm
Teece, whom I mentioned earlier today because of his work for Samsung and who (in)famously wrote on Motorola Mobility's behalf that it only takes one bullet to kill someone with a standard-essential patent (SEP).Toward the end, Judge Holderman's ruling explains why the 9.56 cents per unit Innovatio is (subject to the conditions quoted further above) entitled to "is approximately three times Judge Robart's [F]RAND rate of 3.471 cents per unit". [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 12:13 am
While I commented on a couple of topics last week (Google's declaratory judgment action against Rockstar and Apple's renewed motion for a U.S. permanent injunction against Samsung), I haven't checked on the dockets of most of the cases I follow in ten days. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 1:54 am
Apple was denied a preliminary injunction against Samsung over the rubber-banding (overscroll bounce) patent; Microsoft was denied a preliminary injunction against Motorola (and recently withdrew the related appeal); and Apple was unlikely to prevail on more than a small part of its photo gallery patent case against HTC, with hardly a chance of prevailing on a couple of other multi-touch patents.The fundamental issue with today's patent-in-suit is that the claim language refers to an… [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 1:00 am
I did, however, predict and comment favorably on the antisuit injunctions Microsoft obtained against Motorola in the Western District of Washington (Judge Robart, affirmed by the Ninth Circuit) and Samsung against Huawei in the Northern District of California (Judge Orrick). [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 9:23 am
The Federal Circuit already has three very interesting smartphone IP cases scheduled for August (Microsoft-Google cross appeal of ITC ruling on Microsoft's complaint against Motorola, Apple's appeal of Judge Koh's denial of a permanent injunction against Samsung) and September (Apple-Motorola cross-appeal of Judge Posner's ruling). [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 8:31 am
Peter does a fab job using the Police song to describe how each line in the song relates to current security considerations… Xbox will watch your moves; bonds you break = unfriending; night you stay = Google calendar; every word = Siri or Echo; watching you = Samsung TV; move you make = smart watches; smile you make = vision systems coupled with machine learning; watching you = >5B video cameras. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 8:33 am
Peiker's counsel noted that Nokia not only excluded Harman (a Samsung subsidiary) from that list but even explicitly stated that Daimler cars incorporating TCUs made by Harman were not being targeted at this stage.Dr. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 8:36 am
In 2012, Apple failed with a motion for a preliminary injunction against two Samsung products in Munich, where the court doubted the validity of the patent-in-suit. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 7:41 am
SEP holders and implementers would be wise to take heed of any guidance as the Commission has been known to bring enforcement action on FRAND issues itself (resulting in Samsung offering commitments and an infringement decision against Motorola in 2014). [read post]
