Search for: "State v. Burden"
Results 5341 - 5360
of 22,149
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
Tuberville v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
Tuberville v. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 1:36 pm
The court’s June 2023 decision in Groff v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:18 pm
Brown v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 12:18 pm
Of Pharmacy v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 11:53 am
McGee v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 8:12 am
” Id. at *10 (quoting Woods-Early v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 2:03 pm
The burden then shifted to Progressive to establish whether an issue of fact exists as to whether the verification requests sent by Progressive would serve to extend its time to pay or deny the claim akin to Presbyterian Hosp. v Countrywide Insurance Co. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 2:00 pm
“state-law design defect claims . [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 10:30 am
State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. [read post]
14 Apr 2025, 6:00 am
., Inc. v Town of Greenburgh Police Dept., 229 AD3d 789, the Appellate Division opined "Contrary to [SCPD's] contention", the withheld records of unsubstantiated, unfounded, or exonerated allegations of police officer misconduct "were not categorically exempt from disclosure". [read post]
14 Apr 2025, 6:00 am
., Inc. v Town of Greenburgh Police Dept., 229 AD3d 789, the Appellate Division opined "Contrary to [SCPD's] contention", the withheld records of unsubstantiated, unfounded, or exonerated allegations of police officer misconduct "were not categorically exempt from disclosure". [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 3:01 am
Schneider v. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 11:26 am
Yesterday CAAF docketed two certified issues in an Air Force case:WHETHER THE AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS APPLIED THE CORRECT STANDARD OF REVIEW WHEN DETERMINING WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ABUSED HIS DISCRETION WHEN HE DENIED THE DEFENSE MOTION FOR A SANITY BOARD.WHETHER THE AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED BY FINDING THE MILITARY JUDGE ABUSED HIS DISCRETION WHEN HE DENIED APPELLANT'S REQUEST FOR A SANITY BOARD FINDING HE HAD NOT MET HIS BURDEN OF FACTUAL PERSUASION TO… [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 8:11 am
That's not to say it never happens, but it's rare, as Nielson v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 6:45 am
” (Burwell v. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 6:04 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Jerry White v. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 5:30 am
In 2012, the Supreme Court of the United States limited third-party (often grandparent) visitation rights in Troxel v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 2:14 am
It does not appear to have a trademark in Russia, the Respondents’ home jurisdiction in TATRA, a.s. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 10:17 am
The scope of liability under Samiento v. [read post]
