Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B."
Results 5341 - 5360
of 15,316
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2011, 5:00 am
Robert V. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 11:49 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 8:10 am
In that respect, the court noted (as also previously stated by the EUIPO) that, according to settled case-law, the application of Article 7(1)(c) of the EUTMR does not depend on the existence of a real, current or serious need to leave a sign free. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 9:53 pm
CRC 5.111(c) provides the procedure by which objections to the contents of such declarations are to be raised in the course of the court’s determination of the motion. [read post]
23 Nov 2023, 1:42 am
In so doing, the court relied on the Division Bench[1]Novartis AG v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
Henricks v. [read post]
2 Jan 2007, 3:50 pm
C-29, s. 3(1)(b));[2] · the declared parent may register the child in school; and, · the declared parent may assert her rights under various laws such as the Health Care Consent Act, 1996, S.O. 1996, c. 2, Sched. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 12:00 pm
We have previously summarized the motions and responses filed in the Churchill v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 8:11 am
Notice Pleading Restoration Act, S. 1504, 111th Cong. (2009): “Except as otherwise expressly provided by an Act of Congress or by an amendment to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure which takes effect after the date of enactment of this Act, a Federal court shall not dismiss a complaint under rule 12(b)(6) or (e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, except under the standards set forth by the Supreme Court of the United States in Conley v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 12:09 pm
In today’s case (Cabezas v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 5:08 am
* Swedes consider the "penal value" of a trade mark infringementProsecutor General v CS (Case B-5484-13) is a trade mark infringement ruling where the Swedish Supreme Court addresses criminal consequences of IP infringement. [read post]
10 Dec 2022, 6:12 am
Select Sources: Prosecutor v. [read post]
10 Dec 2022, 6:12 am
Select Sources: Prosecutor v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 5:58 am
The court’s power to strike out a statement of case as an abuse of process Under CPR 3.4(2), the court may strike out a statement of case if: (a) the statement of case discloses no reasonable grounds for bringing or defending the claim; (b) the statement of case is an abuse of the court’s process or is otherwise likely to obstruct the just disposal of the proceedings; or (c) there has been a failure to comply with a rule, practice direction or… [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 12:12 pm
Written by: Jay B. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 5:28 pm
("Big C") for debts incurred by Joseph Saviano d/b/a Classic Builders. [read post]
15 May 2024, 7:41 am
§507(b). [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 11:09 am
In Crooks v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 4:35 pm
The Georgia Court of Appeals disagreed, quoting OCGA 19-6-15(c)(2)(B) which states that the trial court is authorized to order the "manner, how often, to whom, and until when the support shall be paid. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 1:22 am
The latter part of the presentation covered recent cases on medicines regulation, focussing on R(Roche Registration Ltd) v Secretary of State for Health [2015] EWCA Civ 1311 (although this English Court of Appeal decision was handed down on 21 December 2015, it may have escaped your radar due to seasonal festivities and/or the mad rush to tie up loose ends before the Christmas vacation...) [read post]
