Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 5341 - 5360
of 9,085
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2014, 9:03 pm
In an opinion by Justice Burke, the Court affirmed the judgment of Division 1 of the First District Appellate Court in Hayashi v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:27 pm
Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Six. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:27 pm
Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Six. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 9:03 am
” State v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 9:02 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
The United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri ruled that the Guidelines were constitutional. [read post]
8 Nov 2014, 5:53 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 3:22 pm
SaywellColonial Justice: Justice, Morality and Crime in the Niagara District, 1791-1849 by David MurrayCanadian State Trials Volume Two: Rebellion and Invasion in the Canadas, 1837-8 edited by F. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
All prescription medical products have inherent risks – which is why the FDA requires a physician’s prescription in the first place. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 1:23 pm
R (Jakimaviciute) v Hammersmith & Fulham (our note here) was a judicial review permission decision on a challenge to H&F’s allocation policy excluding the ‘homeless in long term secure temporary accommodation’ from being qualifying persons for the Part 6 housing list. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 10:59 am
Long-time readers can recite the first question presented by heart: whether it is per se unreasonable for a state not to provide an evidentiary hearing on a judicial-bias claim. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 10:13 am
District Judge Ortrie D. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 10:03 am
In Smedley v Smedley, --- F.3d ----, 2014 WL 5647426 (C.A.4 (N.C.)) the Smedleys married in 2000 in Germany, where Mark was stationed as a member of the United States Army. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 9:27 am
At any rate, the burden is on the plaintiffs, under the Amnesty v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 2:34 pm
(Most other states take the same view.) [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 2:33 pm
E060038), the Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the Riverside County Superior Court’s judgment denying a petition for a writ of mandate challenging an EIR for the Perris Dam Remediation Project. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 7:50 am
United States) and “attempted burglary” (James v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 9:48 am
Conclusion The JHP Pharmaceuticals decision is the first judicial decision to apply POM Wonderful to Lanham Act challenges to drug labeling and advertising. [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 3:09 am
ET AL. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 1:23 pm
Just what we need: another opportunity for the Roberts Court to pad a narrow ruling with a lot of ill-considered dicta about Smith v. [read post]
