Search for: "State v. Heard"
Results 5341 - 5360
of 17,246
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2014, 6:55 am
Since the M(K) v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 6:55 am
Since the M(K) v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 6:55 am
Since the M(K) v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 3:08 am
Reference by the Attorney General for Northern Ireland – Abortion Services (Safe Access Zones) (Northern Ireland) Bill, heard 19th July 2022 R (on the application of VIP Communications Ltd (In Liquidation)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 4th October 2022 of DCM (Optical Holdings) v Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 12th October 2022 McCue v Glasgow City… [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
In doing so, the court stated that this appeal would be heard along with appeals from the decisions in National Football League, et al. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 6:27 am
In Parnell v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 2:45 am
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Payne & Anor, heard 4 November 2011. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 3:15 am
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Payne & Anor, heard 4 November 2011. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 1:17 pm
The case is Quanta Computer, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 10:49 am
Hines v. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 2:28 am
State v. [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 9:56 am
In United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 1:37 pm
The Issue in Front of the Supreme Court In the case, Caniglia v. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 12:45 pm
” United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 5:47 pm
In JG v. [read post]
4 May 2021, 3:21 am
In this post, Yeva Agayan, an associate in the Litigation and Arbitration team at CMS, previews a case BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA [2019] EWCA Civ 112 which is being heard by the UK Supreme Court this week and relates to a payment of a dividend. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 8:41 am
The Court drew comfort from the decision in R (AHK) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWHC 1117 (Admin), [2012] ACD 66 in which Ouseley J held that the fact that the open material in an immigration judicial review did not provide a sustainable reason for the decisions in question in AHK would not lead to the decisions being quashed. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 8:14 am
Additional Resources:Cheeks v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 1:02 pm
There is a serious side to this case – Ohio is, after all, the state whose right of publicity laws produced Zacchini v. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 4:23 pm
Judgments The following reserved judgment in media law cases are outstanding: R (Evans) v HM Attorney-General, heard 24 and 25 November 2014 (UK Supreme Court) Rufus v Elliott, heard 10 December 2014 (McCombe and Sharp LJJ and Mitting J) OPO v MLA, heard 9 and 20 January 2015 (UK Supreme Court) Murray v Associated Newspapers, heard 21 January 2015 (Longmore, Ryder and Sharp LJJ) Rai v… [read post]
