Search for: "State v. Holder" Results 5341 - 5360 of 7,211
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2014, 3:04 am
The same provision further states that the ISP’s knowledge is to be presumed only when an infringement notice sent by the right holder includes certain detailed information like “the specific localisation of the contested content” -- that is to say, the URL of the allegedly infringing content. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 8:50 am by Nedim Malovic
Based on the evidence in the case, the court found that the defendant had not been able to show that the watches had been put on the EU market by the trade mark holder. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 12:27 pm by Don Cruse
And it cleaned up an earlier opinion without formally granting rehearing.1 New grant: How to calculate a landowner’s damages when the State takes only part of a piece of property The State of Texas v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 2:54 am by Ben
In the wake of the CJEU's decision in Public Relations Consultants Association Ltd v Newspaper Licensing Agency Ltd and Others (case C‑360/13) which held that browsing and viewing articles online does not require authorisation from the copyright holder, The PRCA has rejected an offer of a meeting with the Copyright Licensing Agency because it says it falls short of the terms it called for. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 12:09 am
Furthermore, since Hadid smiled and posed for the photo, she contributed to the creativity and originality of the image, pointing to Rogers v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 8:57 am by Venkat Balasubramani
At the same time, the court says “a copyright holder’s consideration of fair use need not be searching or intensive. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 12:42 am by Marie Louise
United States (271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Gray on Claims) (IPBiz) (IPBiz) (PatLit) CAFC: Another means-plus-function opinion: General Protecht Group, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 5:06 pm by INFORRM
Supreme Court The most significant US Supreme Court decision in this area since our last round-up is one that we trailed in January of this year, in United States v Jones (10-1259 01/23/2012). [read post]