Search for: "State v. Holderness" Results 5341 - 5360 of 8,249
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2012, 5:55 pm by FDABlog HPM
  It states: If an owner of the patent or the holder of the approved application under [FDC Act § 505(b)] for the drug that is claimed by the patent or a use of which is claimed by the patent brings a patent infringement action against the applicant, the applicant may assert a counterclaim seeking an order requiring the holder to correct or delete the patent information submitted by the holder under [FDC Act § 505(b)] or (c) on the ground that the… [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 1:51 pm by Mark S. Nelson
The SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance has published frequently asked questions stating how the division expects to apply certain provisions within Titles V and VI of the Jumpstart Our Business Startups (JOBS) Act, which became law April 5, 2012. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:08 pm by nflatow
Epps goes on to explain that the very same decision that established judicial review, Marbury v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 12:47 pm by Edward A. Fallone
My response to that is to quote Justice Holmes in Lochner v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 10:40 am
State law dictates that a company member cannot be held liable unless that member breaches a fiduciary duty, such as by commingling personal funds with business funds. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 7:42 am by Ryan Blay
  And of course, the holder of any junior mortgage. [read post]