Search for: "State v. Keis" Results 5341 - 5360 of 22,497
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  Will he lead the “transformation” that the United States desperately needs? [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 3:06 am by Keith Mallinson
Delrahim rightly states that “[w]e should not transform commitments to license on FRAND terms into a compulsory licensing scheme. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed that ruling, but last week, in Jones v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 3:03 pm by Kevin LaCroix
[v] Thinking we would need to work our way through the details of complying with the current statutory conflict-of-interest safe harbors of Chapter 607, we consulted with Gary Teblum, my partner who was active in the recent revision of Chapter 607. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 11:02 am by Michael Lowe
Today, shoplifting is considered a type of theft, where intent to deprive the store of its property is the key element for conviction. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 1:18 pm by Eric Goldman
Almost certainly unintentionally, the court in Compulife takes the key holding of hiQ Labs, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 12:32 pm by Jane Turner
In July of 2011, he filed a qui tam lawsuit under the False Claims Act, Blake Percival v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 12:32 pm by Jane Turner
In July of 2011, he filed a qui tam lawsuit under the False Claims Act, Blake Percival v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 11:32 am by Anne Joseph O'Connell
But these succession issues have gained a more public profile after the Government Accountability Office (GAO), a watchdog that works for Congress, issued a legal opinion in August dinging key personnel moves as illegal. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 9:49 am by Rachael Hanna
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decided United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 9:06 am by Alexander Volberding and Peter J. Brown
The DOL revised these regulations in response to a challenge by the State of New York and a ruling by the District Court the Southern District of New York in that matter (See (New York v. [read post]