Search for: "State v. Saide"
Results 5341 - 5360
of 57,120
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2017, 12:57 pm
Div. 1998);State v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:58 am
The US Supreme Court held Wednesday in Dawson v. [read post]
3 May 2008, 7:15 am
The lead case is Commissioner of Insurance v. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 1:55 pm
” United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 6:00 am
Citing Seifullah v City of New York, 161 AD3d 1206, the Appellate Division said contrary to the Plaintiff's contention, the filing of a notice of claim was a condition precedent to the maintenance of his action and Plaintiff's reliance upon Margerum v City of Buffalo (24 NY3d 721) was misplaced. * See Executive Law §296. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 6:00 am
Citing Seifullah v City of New York, 161 AD3d 1206, the Appellate Division said contrary to the Plaintiff's contention, the filing of a notice of claim was a condition precedent to the maintenance of his action and Plaintiff's reliance upon Margerum v City of Buffalo (24 NY3d 721) was misplaced. * See Executive Law §296. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 4:15 am
In Pasadena Republican Club v. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 6:57 am
The magistrate judge recommended denying defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiff's willful infringement claim for failure to state a claim and found that the Supreme Court's recent decision in Halo Elecs., Inc. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 4:15 am
In W.B. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2019, 9:15 am
Teva, which Michel characterized as “completely illogical”, and Impression Products, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 5:00 am
Citing Seifullah v City of New York, 161 AD3d 1206, the Appellate Division said contrary to the Plaintiff's contention, the filing of a notice of claim was a condition precedent to the maintenance of his action and Plaintiff's reliance upon Margerum v City of Buffalo (24 NY3d 721) was misplaced. * See Executive Law §296. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 8:05 am
During his career, Judge Garza was a strong critic of Roe v. [read post]
14 May 2014, 4:05 am
In Latta v. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
In Eris Evolution, LLC v. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 7:30 am
., LLC v National Wine & Spirits, Inc., 196 3d 883, the Appellate Division, Third Department, said its "longstanding doctrine of judicial estoppel has been succinctly stated as follows: Where a party assumes a position in one legal [action or] proceeding and succeeds in maintaining that position, that party may not subsequently assume a contrary position in a second [action or] proceeding because its interests have changed. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 4:05 am
” Matal v. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 7:30 am
., LLC v National Wine & Spirits, Inc., 196 3d 883, the Appellate Division, Third Department, said its "longstanding doctrine of judicial estoppel has been succinctly stated as follows: Where a party assumes a position in one legal [action or] proceeding and succeeds in maintaining that position, that party may not subsequently assume a contrary position in a second [action or] proceeding because its interests have changed. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 5:00 am
Citing Seifullah v City of New York, 161 AD3d 1206, the Appellate Division said contrary to the Plaintiff's contention, the filing of a notice of claim was a condition precedent to the maintenance of his action and Plaintiff's reliance upon Margerum v City of Buffalo (24 NY3d 721) was misplaced. * See Executive Law §296. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 4:00 am
In Spell v. [read post]
4 Sep 2010, 7:47 am
Wawrzyniak v. [read post]
