Search for: "State v. Sotomayor"
Results 5341 - 5360
of 5,863
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2010, 6:50 am
The biggest news out of the Court yesterday was the opinion in United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 3:10 pm
"The institution is not going in the direction he thinks it should," he said.That was clear this year when he was on the losing side in Citizens United v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 12:51 pm
A Service from the ABA Criminal Justice Section, http://www.abanet.org/crimjust United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 1:02 pm
., police department and his texting partners drew a little sympathy from the Justices during the oral argument in Ontario v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 10:18 am
That was the way the argument came and went Monday in Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 6:30 am
See Dred Scott v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am
Souter is of course now gone, replaced by Justice Sotomayor. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 5:44 am
Judge Sotomayor now sits on the Supreme Court, but Judge Straub on the Second Circuit is now carrying the torch.The case is Taravella v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 2:19 pm
Souter was replaced by Justice Sonia Sotomayor last year. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 12:02 pm
That is what the Supreme Court said as well in Hamdi v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 9:48 pm
The story of Michigan v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 4:58 pm
See, e.g., Leventhal v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 2:04 pm
Hardwick, and he dissented in both Roe v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 4:34 pm
Posted by Philip Miles, an employment lawyer with McQuaide Blasko in State College, Pennsylvania. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 4:01 pm
Republicans have no problem with an activist court when it asserts itself into state election law as it did in Bush v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 1:09 pm
Last summer, President Obama nominated Justice Sotomayor to the Supreme Court after Justice Souter stepped down. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am
Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 8:52 am
Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 1:01 pm
“We’ll wait and see to see if the most recent change fits that,” he said of Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who joined the court last year. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 9:21 pm
I’m embarrassingly late in posting a link to the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates, P.A. v. [read post]
