Search for: "Still v. Justice Court" Results 5341 - 5360 of 19,599
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
  Indeed, as was confirmed by the oral argument last October in the still-pending case of Fisher v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 9:22 am by Florian Mueller
Matthias Zigann of the Munich I Regional Court's 7th Civil Chamber for taking a perfect set of precautionary measures at last week's Sharp v. [read post]
27 Oct 2007, 1:39 pm
" The Court, then, is convinced that the values of openness and access to justice must outweigh all other interests in principle, at least. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 2:29 pm
The Maryland Court of Special Appeals ruled yesterday in Peyton-Henderson v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 1:15 pm by Mark Walsh
Next up is our star attraction of the day, Justice Scalia with the court’s opinion in Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 11:04 am by Orin Kerr
Still, I think there are some interesting similarities.In both cases, Justice Kennedy writes a 5–4 decision chipping away at a significant Warren Court precedent (Miranda v. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 4:24 am
In permitting this, the Court appears to have cast aside the privacy provisions of the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA).The decision in Arons v. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 9:05 pm by Elle Rothermich
After joining the Supreme Court, Justice Ginsburg wrote the majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 11:24 pm by Florian Mueller
I'm still grateful for a very interesting conversation on a train ride from Bayreuth to Nuremberg after a conference, so I don't want to criticize the Federal Court of Justice for a decision that I regard as inconsistent with the letter and the spirit of Article 52 EPC. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 10:13 am by Rick Garnett
  In early November, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in a case called Town of Greece v. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 8:49 am by Adam Baker
Reasoning In a five to four split, the majority decision was delivered by Justices Abella and Rothstein (Justices LeBel, Deschamps and Fish concurring), while dissenting reasons were written by Justice Charron (Chief Justice McLachlin and Justices Bastarache and Binnie concurring in dissent). [read post]