Search for: "T. R. W. "
Results 5341 - 5360
of 8,399
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2010, 9:22 am
They may not want to be exploited, he said, but "[w]hat they really need to do is self-exploit. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 6:33 pm
Posted by: Andrew W. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 7:37 am
Considering disruptive effects caused by the investigation and separation of soldiers from their units, the imperative that soldiers work together undeterred by personal likes or dislikes, and the practical application of the policy, by which soldiers who are scheduled for deployment, or are serving in combat theaters, are less likely to be investigated or discharged, do you think the current policy of don't ask, don't tell promotes or discourages unit cohesion? [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 2:20 pm
"We still don't have an answer. [read post]
29 Sep 2007, 10:55 am
09/29/2007LANCASTER COUNTY - A former Lancaster city police officer pleaded guilty Friday to indecent assault of his roommate's girlfriend at their home last March.Kenneth W. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 6:31 am
He further testifies that his employer does not withhold payroll taxes or social security from his pay and does not issue W-2s at the end of the year. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 5:47 pm
Posted by: Andrew W. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 5:08 pm
Gov't; from Supreme Court website. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 10:30 am
The federal government could withhold the exact amount of the tax burden, as long as a taxpayer didn’t have any major changes to income level or filling status. [read post]
27 May 2009, 2:36 am
Posted by: Probate attorney Andrew W. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 5:09 am
"Erin W. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 3:03 pm
These are workers who: (1) begin employment with the employer after Feb. 3, 2010 and before Jan. 1, 2011, (2) certify by signed affidavit, under penalties of perjury, that they haven't been employed for more than 40 hours during the 60-day period ending on the date the individual begins employment with the qualified employer; (3) do not replace other employees of the employer (unless those employees left voluntarily or for cause), and (4) aren't related to the employer… [read post]
18 Jan 2009, 11:02 pm
Convicted felons have the right to vote in New York (but they don't serve on juries, which I don't mind). [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 7:37 am
Don't pull out the handkerchiefs yet. [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 8:50 am
You can't go too far without losing the good opinion of people whose votes you need. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 8:35 am
(Steps aside bc her 1st Amend.rights ceased 2exist thx 2activists trying 2silence"isn't American,not fair")"She then posted a follow-up:“Dr.Laura=even more powerful & effective w/out the shackles,so watch out Constitutional obstructionists. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 8:07 am
Hmm, isn't that what a "newsletter, twice monthly" does ... twice monthly? [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 6:41 pm
Posted by: Probate attorney Andrew W. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 4:26 pm
If you are unsure as to whether there is a report or you just don’t have it yet, the attorneys at the Law Offices of Edward A. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 12:54 pm
We don't know. [read post]
