Search for: "United States v. Heard" Results 5341 - 5360 of 8,393
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2013, 4:30 am by Guest Blogger
This is a remedy applied in the United States to ensure that the courts are not used to authorize discovery for cases that will not be heard. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 9:49 pm by Kurt T. Koehler
The United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments today in Koontz v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 3:54 pm by Jennifer Granick
  When so many thoughtful people, including former prosecutors, disagree with United States Attorney's conduct in these cases, we need to stop. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 6:02 am by Sheldon Toplitt
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)A three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia last week heard arguments from a conservative watchdog group seeking to overturn a federal judge's refusal to order the U.S. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 4:30 am by Scott A. McKeown
Kappos) Last week the Federal Circuit heard oral argument (here) in Abbott Laboratories v. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
There are also a number of resolved cases: A woman v Lancashire Telegraph (Clauses 1, 3, 11/01/2013); A man v The Sun (Clauses 4, 5, 6, 11/01/2013); Mrs Emma Drury-Ward v Chat (Clause 1, 11/01/2013); Ms Tina Hallett & Mr Jonathan Apps v Daily Mail (Clause 1, 11/01/2013); A man v Daily Mail (Clauses 1, 3, 11/01/2013); Sarah Cookv Easy Living, (Clause 3, 11/01/2013); Mr Joe Cooke v The Daily Telegraph (Clause 1, 11/01/2013); Mr Bruce Elliott… [read post]
12 Jan 2013, 10:41 pm by Jeff Gamso
Some Poor Fuckup or United States of America v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 11:50 am by Lyle Denniston
  The issue is whether such a recommendation qualifies as “property” under the Hobbs Act, which makes it a crime to obtain property by threats. ** United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 11:44 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
The United States Supreme Court heard arguments this week in a case in which Missouri prosecutors asked the Court to rule that warrants are not necessary to collect blood samples from individuals suspected of driving while intoxicated. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 5:55 am by Barbara Bavis
  Further, the United States Supreme Court recently heard arguments in Vance v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 8:38 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Maatman, Jr. and Rebecca Bjork On January 7, the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral argument in Standard Fire Insurance Company v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 9:02 am by Lyle Denniston
Perry – constitutionality of California’s “Proposition 8″ ban on same-sex marriage; also, question of standing to appeal Wednesday, March 27: 12-307 — United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 6:21 am by Marissa Miller
Baby Girl, United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 3:00 am by David Oscar Markus
  Here's SCOTUSblog's coverage of the issue:The Justices agreed to hear an appeal by the federal government in United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 11:15 am by Lyle Denniston
The Justices agreed to hear an appeal by the federal government in United States v. [read post]