Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend" Results 5341 - 5360 of 6,888
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2012, 4:11 am by Ken Lammers
 The defendants love them because they don't have to go to jail. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:12 am by Ken Lammers
 The defendants love them because they don't have to go to jail. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:11 am by Ken Lammers
 The defendants love them because they don't have to go to jail. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:12 am by Ken Lammers
 The defendants love them because they don't have to go to jail. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Berger
  (Of course, these labels have descriptive weight, except when they don't. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 2:40 pm
  I don't mind gentle correction. [read post]
2 May 2007, 10:17 am
Of #3, there are many things that may be viewed as "obvious to try," that for any of various reasons, don't actually get tried. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 2:34 pm
"This is what can happen if you don't settle," RIAA attorney Richard Gabriel told reporters outside the courthouse. [read post]
14 Mar 2009, 1:54 am
"I don't believe that an equal-protection argument is necessarily closed off in the future," Conway said. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 3:15 am by SHG
That was the point of the mandatory minimums, to allow politicians to prove to voters how tough they were on crime on the backs of every hated miscreant in the system and usurping the function and authority of judges, who couldn't be trusted anyway since they have life tenure and don't need to be re-elected. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 5:32 pm
The arbitrator, a retired judge, determined that the defendants had obtained Mr. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 9:23 am
She said she didn't mind, though Judge Gertner quickly made clear that the trial would not delve into that subject. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 1:45 pm
MORE: Commenter Don Dixon asked "isn't this what cross-examination is for? [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 3:45 am
Mitchell, one 6th Circuit judge suggested that the most competent way to represent a defendant in a capital case is to be incompetent in the penalty phase:Â if you dig up all manner of "mitigating" evidence, the chances of the jury being impressed with it are small, while if you don't, the chances are very good that you'll be found incompetent down the road, and you'll have saved your client's… [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 1:25 pm by Bridget
"You don't know what it means to have a little bit of hope all of a sudden. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 2:29 am by SHG
  After all, if he didn't want to get shot, he shouldn't be on someone else's property, they say. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 11:54 am by Greg McNeal
  But short of those democratic means of persuasion, I don't see much that supports the media's case. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 11:38 am by Terry Lenamon
[t]he basic question -- does the system accurately and consistently determine which defendants "deserve" to die? [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 9:09 am by CJLF Staff
"  "This is a good example of why you don't understand the law," Sweet fired back. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 7:56 am by Steve Hall
"I don't need to know whether Willingham moved his car or what kind of husband he was," Kerrigan said after Bradley criticized her for failing to read the entire trial transcript.In other action, commissioners discussed rescheduling a November session in which they hope to interview fire experts about the case.They also agreed to drop testimony from Florida fire authority John Lentini, who was a key witness in Thursday's court of inquiry… [read post]