Search for: "v. " Results 5341 - 5360 of 493,812
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2022, 1:39 am
Supreme People's Court of the Peoples' Republic of ChinaAuthor ONUnicorn Licence CC BY-SA 3.0 Source Wikimedia Common Jane LambertPatents Court (HH Judge Hacon) Nokia Technologies OY and another v Oneplus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd and others (Rev1) [2021] EWHC 2952 (Pat) (4 Nov 2021)This was an application to HH Judge Hacon sitting as a judge of the Patents Court to set aside service of [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 7:05 pm
I've been working too hard lately on other projects, and Steve Del Percio over at Green Buildings NYC did a nice post on the decision in AHRI v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 3:52 am by tracey
Regina v Dowds: [2012] EWCA Crim 281;  [2012] WLR (D)  43 “The reformulation of the statutory conditions for diminished responsibility was not intended to reverse the well established rule that voluntary acute intoxication was incapable of being relied on to found diminished responsibility and the presence of a recognised medical condition, although necessary, was not always a sufficient condition to raise the issue of diminished responsibility.” WLR… [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 2:26 am
Jane Lambert Patents Court (HH Judge Hacon) Technetix BV and another v Teleste Ltd  [2019] EWHC 3106 (Pat) (18 Nov 2019) This was a claim for patent infringement and a counterclaim for revocation on grounds of anticipation, obviousness and added matter. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 1:51 am by sally
Regina v Major [2010] WLR (D) 309 “The Registrar of Criminal Appeals had power to grant a representation order in respect of an application or appeal against a restraining order imposed on acquittal of an offence, pursuant to the provisions of s 5A of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 1:41 am
Intellectual Property Office Crown Copyright Jane Lambert Intellectual Property Office (Phil Thorpe) Innermost Ltd. v Warm BL 0/464/19 6 March 2020 Over the years the UK has consistently trailed its neighbours in the number of European patent applications. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 6:43 am by JAntonelli
For more information about your subpoena visit our […] The post Malibu Media LLC v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 2:52 am by traceydennis
Jones v Kaney [2011] UKSC 13;  [2011] WLR (D)  109 “The immunity from suit for breach of duty that expert witnesses had previously enjoyed in relation to their participation in legal proceedings should be abolished. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 7:53 am by Larkin Reynolds
This morning the Supreme Court denied cert. in Al Adahi v. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 3:02 am
 Jane LambertPatents Court (HH Judge Hacon) Autostore Technology AS v Ocado Group Plc and others [2023] EWHC 716 (Pat) (30 March 2023)This was a patent infringement action. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 10:38 am
The Rolls Building Author Basher Eyre Licence Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 GenericSource Wikipedia Rolls Building Jane Lambert Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (HH Judge Hacon)  Coloplast AS v MacGregor Healthcare Ltd [2018] EWHC 2797 (IPEC) (24 Oct 2018) This was a claim by the Danish company, Coloplast AS, against MacGregor Healthcare Ltd for [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 10:27 am by Steven W. Seymour
Just after 6:00 pm on that date, Scott and Dyer attacked Fearon and his companion, Junior Inneh, stabbing both, and killing Fearon.The post The Queen v Scott and Dyer: A Sabbatical in England appeared first on Samuels Yoelin Kantor LLP.. [read post]
23 Oct 2021, 7:19 am
Jane LambertPatents Court (Mr Justice Meade) Optis Cellular Technology LLC and others v Apple Retail UK Ltd and others  [2021] EWHC 1739 (Pat) (25 June 2021)This was the second of a series of trials between the claimant patent portfolio owners and the defendant implementors in FRAND litigation. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 7:01 am
You may recall that in the summer of 2005 in another Commission v Council case, C- [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 7:51 pm by Ryan
by Ryan McKeen Hearing that the issue of standing will be raised in Bysiewicz v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 1:37 am by sally
Jayasinghe v Liyanage [2010] EWHC 265 (Ch); [2010] WLR (D) 44 “The adjudicator to the Land Registry had jurisdiction to conduct a trial of the question of beneficial entitlement to property where an objection to an application was made to the registrar and the matter referred to the adjudicator under s 73(7) of the Land Registration Act 2002. [read post]