Search for: "Black v. State" Results 5361 - 5380 of 9,187
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2009, 2:12 pm
Opinion below(7th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Docket: 08-769 Title: United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 1:15 pm
"  Whenever you see a case like State v. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 8:10 am
The body-builder silhouetteCan “a silhouette, represented in black, of a person adopting a typical body-building pose displaying the muscles of his body” be registered as a trade mark for – among other things – nutritional supplements, clothing, and footwear? [read post]
22 May 2020, 8:51 am by Jeffery Robinson
 Is it through litigation, legislation, state-based work, or is it all three and more? [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 10:56 am by Colleen Fitzharris, E.D. Mich.
This week, the Sixth Circuit weighed in on the intersection between unhelpful shortcuts and jury deliberations in United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 2:15 pm by Steve Vladeck
If anything, Justice Kennedy’s first query of the day proved the point, when he encouraged Urbanski to turn to the second question presented (which the Justices had added) on whether, on the merits, the Ninth Circuit’s de novo analysis of the harmlessness of the state trial court’s error had misapplied the Supreme Court’s standard for prejudice under Brecht v. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 8:35 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
They also drew on the Federal Court of Appeal decision in Canada Post Corp. v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
 John Marshall ended his first paragraph in McCulloch v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 5:39 am by admin
State of California (1992) 4 Cal.4th 668, 680-681; see also California Teachers Assn. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 1:54 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The security officer also stated that he apprehended the defendant outside the store and recovered the merchandise from defendant's black plastic bag. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 6:09 am
" "A potent precedent favoring the constitutionally-questionable provisions of the United States Patriot Act passed shortly after the September 11, 2001 attacks, the 1917 law was given the Supreme Court's approval in Schenk v United States, when Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote, 'When a nation is at war many things that might be said in time of peace are such a hindrance to its efforts that their utterance will not be endured so long as men… [read post]