Search for: "Body v. Body" Results 5361 - 5380 of 21,333
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2007, 7:43 pm
In Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Jurlique International Pty Ltd [2007] FCA 79 (8 February 2007), Justice Spender of the Federal Court ordered penalties totalling $3.4 million plus costs against companies in the Jurlique cosmetics group and its founder. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 12:34 pm by Guest and Gray Law Firm
On June 26, 2015, the Supreme Court of the United States held, in Obergefell v. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 6:18 am
Kling, 474 U.S. 936, 938 (1985), and compares the practice "like the decision to promulgate a rule spawning a body of secret law - plainly wrong. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 12:14 pm
Just a quick note that Publawyer has posted an excellent discussion of YL v Birmingham and the broader impact on thinking about functional public authorities for the purposes of the Human Rights Act. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 10:29 pm by Team
On July 7th 2011, the grand chamber of the Court stated again in its judgment Al-Skeini and others v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 10:29 pm by Team
On July 7th 2011, the grand chamber of the Court stated again in its judgment Al-Skeini and others v. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 1:37 am by CMS
Historically, the English courts have policed the parameters of the “same interest” test strictly: Emerald Supplies Ltd v British Airways Plc [2010] EWCA Civ 1284. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 11:17 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
The signals generated by the antenna are thus transmitted to the high frequency body for amplification.A flat cable is mounted on the side of the high frequency body and is secured thereto for outputting the signal of the high frequency body to further receiver circuits. [read post]