Search for: "Branch v. State" Results 5361 - 5380 of 8,125
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2013, 12:30 pm by Lyle Denniston
  An admiralty case is one that can only be decided in a federal, not a state court. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 11:16 am by Gritsforbreakfast
(Go here for links to both budgets; the criminal justice/public safety budgets are in Article V.)First things first, both the House and Senate budgets failed to restore funding cut last session from the prison healthcare budget, despite the fact that the Legislative Budget Board had to agree to additional funding mid-biennium in order to keep the UT Medical Branch in Galveston as their main provider. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 7:32 am by Jay Stanley
The second memo, dated July 2012, is titled “Guidance Regarding the Application of United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 1:38 pm by Paul A. Prados
Fact, stating in part:"The debt limit is the total amount of money that the United States government is authorized to borrow to meet its existing legal obligations . . . [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 7:34 am by Curtis Bradley
  This was evident in a decision in November by the Eleventh Circuit in United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 6:34 am by Lyle Denniston
In another significant denial, the Court passed up a significant opportunity to consider limiting the power of the executive branch under the Court’s 2008 decision in Munaf v. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 8:00 am by Benjamin Wittes
Their legal disabilities arose from rules of the common law and law of nations which dated back centuries but were still upheld in commentary, political branch practice and judicial opinions well into the twentieth century, including in two other Supreme Court decisions from 1942. [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 6:48 am by Dennis Crouch
One of the key pieces of evidence in the trial was an old email from a Seagate engineer noting that the CMU invention went well beyond the current state of the art. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 9:01 pm by John Dean
  This problem has become acute for the Judicial Branch. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 10:50 am
Relying on Balbuena v IDR Realty LLC, the defendants contend that, because the plaintiff, an undocumented alien who is ineligible for employment in this country, submitted false documentation when he was hired by City Wide, he was not entitled to any damages for lost wages. [read post]