Search for: "COOPER v. STATE"
Results 5361 - 5380
of 7,425
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2010, 4:15 am
Ltd.. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 3:10 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
1 Jan 2025, 9:01 pm
Anderson (ruling that states could not determine eligibility for federal office), City of Grants Pass v. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 7:15 am
The case of Friedrichs v. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 5:08 am
In addition to the obligation to conduct a domestic investigation into events occurring on their own territories, member States are also subject to a duty in cross-border trafficking cases to cooperate effectively with the relevant authorities of other States concerned in the investigation of events which occurred outside their territories. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 4:59 am
Prior to defendants’ termination in April 2022, all parties were cooperatively working to accomplish the ultimate goal on the Sebco IV project. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 3:44 am
ChileAstraZeneca S.A. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 4:49 am
Cooper, supra; Jostan Aluminum Products Co., Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2017, 7:47 am
That state of affairs is a pity but suggests the Gordian knot both states have now worked furiously to create and preserve remains undisturbed. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 11:12 am
In Hudson v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 6:30 am
Unfortunately, the potential for opposition political parties and civil society actors to coalesce in Tunisia – despite the country’s experience with such cooperation – remains weak. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 1:49 pm
The agreement stated that she faced a 20-year prison sentence, but if she fully cooperated and abided by the terms of the agreement the government would recommend to the court that her sentence be reduced to 3 years’ probation. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 3:43 am
V. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 10:31 am
A 2013 bench ruling in Cooper Tire & Rubber v. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
Guida, No. 05-6105 In death penalty habeas proceedings in a case in which petitioner effectuated a murder-for-hire against her husband, denial of habeas relief is affirmed where: 1) state courts reasonably applied Strickland by concluding that petitioner sabotaged her own defense, as counsel's performance is not deficient when counsel follows a client's instructions; 2) state courts reasonably applied Brady because even if certain letters were favorable evidence, and were… [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 10:41 pm
In Acosta v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 10:32 pm
Foster v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 3:15 am
K 3830 S23 2011 Compensation and restitution in investor-state arbitration : principles and practice Borzu Sabahi. [read post]
