Search for: "Call v. Heard" Results 5361 - 5380 of 8,337
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2009, 2:34 pm
" Having looked at the patent filing, the AmeriKat is tempted to agree with Linder.* The appeal in i4i v Microsoft was heard this Wednesday before a three-judge panel in the U.S. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 12:13 pm by Robert B. Lamm
  Eric Glass advises that “[v]irtually all bonds issued in the municipal market with maturities greater than 10 years come with a 10-year call option to be triggered at the discretion of the issuer”. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 9:38 am by lsammis
The filing decision typically results in the prosecutor filing a charging document, called an "information," for all of the same charges for which the defendant was arrested. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 5:36 am by Susan Brenner
  The information was passed on to Joe Montgomery, a Deputy Inspector General for BWC, who called Claborn into his office, where she “engaged in a recorded interview, under oath” with Montgomery and another man. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 5:28 am by Susan Brenner
Shortly thereafter, Barron, shaving in the bathroom, heard a gunshot. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 10:59 am by John Elwood
Metzgar, 13-1241, in which the Court has called for the views of the Solicitor General. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 8:01 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
The general rule now is that judges should be seen but not heard, and woe be onto the judge who strays from calling balls and strikes on the field and starts asking about the merits of the designated hitter rule. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 7:17 am by Ruth Bonino
Key cases to look out for in 2012 Default Retirement Age and age discrimination (Seldon v Clarkson Wright & Jakes being heard with Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police). [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 2:59 pm by Eugene Volokh
He can say, “I heard V threaten to kill me, saw him reaching for his waistband, and was sure that he was going to shoot me”; and unless the jury concludes beyond a reasonable doubt that D — again, the only witness — is lying, D will be off the hook, even if D was well aware that V was no threat at all and just wanted to kill him. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:15 am by John Elwood
Maybe the Court will call for the views of the Solicitor General if that one sticks around. [read post]