Search for: "Cross v. State" Results 5361 - 5380 of 16,703
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2011, 9:33 pm by Perry Herzfeld
Continuing the Australian article round-up, readers may be interested in the following three articles raising points about insolvency: Stewart Maiden, ‘A comparative analysis of the use of the UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-border Insolvency in Australia, Great Britain and the United States’ (2010) 18 Insolvency Law Journal 63: UNCITRAL’s Model Law on Cross-border Insolvency has been adopted by parliaments in 18 states across six continents. [read post]
4 May 2015, 8:51 am by Lyle Denniston
  FERC’s policy, that court ruled, crosses the line and seeks to regulate retail pricing. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 5:01 pm
Here's an excerpt from the Georgia Supreme Court's opinion in Bell v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 6:30 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Second Circuit (Newman, Cabranes and Straub) is not buying this nonsense, and it suspects the DA is changing his story because it realizes that a State Court of Appeals ruling (People v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 1:59 am by Justin Bates, Arden Chambers
In Hounslow LBC v Powell; Leeds CC v Hall; Birmingham CC v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8; [2011] 2 AC 18; [2011] HLR 23, the decision in Pinnock was held to be of general application whenever a public authority seek possession of a property that constitutes a person’s home. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 12:37 pm by Bernie Burk
  The contract by which the Boies Firm engaged Black Cube for Weinstein’s benefit earlier this year (available on The New Yorker website here) specifically states that it supersedes a 2014 written agreement between Black Cube and the Boies Firm, “acting on behalf of the [same] Client,” so it appears that the Boies Firm has engaged Black Cube for Weinstein’s benefit before. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 10:33 am by Aaron Pelley
” http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/836779.no2.pdf State v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 1:53 pm by Katitza Rodriguez
The following articles in the zero draft, released in June, are the focus of our main concerns about Chapter V,  which deals with cross border surveillance and the extent to which Member States must assist each other and collaborate in surveillance on each other's behalf. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 7:04 am
With Monday's decision, the Court now has only one case from its October sitting not yet decided -- Global Crossing Telecom v. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 9:17 am
O'Neill's testimony on cross-examination is relevant to the inquiry of whether the automatic computation step is disclosed by the prior art. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 8:17 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Such concerns are likely overstated, as Alabama argued in its powerful Gonzales v. [read post]