Search for: "Defendant Doe 2" Results 5361 - 5380 of 40,587
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2015, 2:28 pm by Thomas D. Nevins
The majority stated that “the Sherman Act does not authorize . [read post]
7 Nov 2020, 11:32 am by Andrew Delaney
So that leaves this question: where does the 60 days start? [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 3:49 am
(Dontay) Tyler, No. 05-2252 (6th Cir. 3/2/07) (unpublished) (Per Curiam: Merritt, Daughtrey & Griffin, JJ.), the defendant/appellant argued that the district court had failed to address the mitigation presented at the sentencing hearing, citing Richardson. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 8:36 am
Shargel argues that Dreier has cooperated fully with receiver Mark Pomerantz in identifying assets, and does not pose a flight risk. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 11:02 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” Serious question: how does this standing reasoning match up with the presumption of irreparable h [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 1:46 pm by Steve Hall
Justice does not come cheaply, especially when the defendant is accused of being the worst mass murderer in the city's history. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 8:40 am
The Ninth Circuit reversed a holding of the District Court that a customs search of defendant's laptop at LAX Customs was unreasonable. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 10:51 am by Steven Cohen
Husky’s report does not comply with Rule 26(a)(2)(B) Discussion:  Neal relies on Reynolds v. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 11:10 am by Rebecca Tushnet
To prevail on a laches defense, a defendant must show: “(1) that plaintiff had knowledge of defendant’s use of its marks, (2) that plaintiff inexcusably delayed in taking action with respect thereto, and (3) that defendant will be prejudiced by permitting plaintiff inequitably to assert its rights at this time. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 1:04 pm by Eric
AT&T's early termination fee wasn't a penalty, even as applied to a termination with only 2 weeks of service left [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 7:19 am by robhealey
Nevertheless, it must be recognized that a defendant does not have an absolute right to withdraw a plea prior to sentencing. [read post]