Search for: "Doe, Appeal of" Results 5361 - 5380 of 108,001
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2017, 1:57 pm by Edwin Komen and Chidera Anyanwu
As the court discussed, federal copyright law does not provide an answer to the dilemma presented by the facts of this case. [read post]
16 Feb 2008, 8:13 am
Supreme Court to overrule a previous Texas Court of Criminal Appeals decision in the case. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 4:05 am
The Board shook off that argument and tossed the appeal out of the TTAB ring. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 3:57 am
An EPO Board of Appeal has referred the question of double-patenting to the Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBA). [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 7:44 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Although the Court of Appeals cites only one other student harassment case that resulted in a $1 million damages award, Anthony's award does not "shock the judicial conscience," which is the legal standard. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 12:59 pm by Lyle Denniston
   The two appeals courts differed on the constitutionality of the insurance-purchase mandate. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 6:13 pm by Shari Shapiro
  For the record, the building still does not comply with the prerequisites, or the building code. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 6:56 am by Lisa Genecov (US) and Lane Wood (US)
  However, an amicus brief filed by the American Antitrust Institute arguing that the Fifth Circuit does not have jurisdiction in the case because the collateral order doctrine can’t be used to review an order that deals with a substantive legal issue such as state action immunity, prompted the TMB to return to Judge Pitman to request he certify a Fifth Circuit appeal. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 6:19 pm
And, because the court’s contempt order does not dispose of any claims in this case, the requirements for certification under Rule 54(b) are not satisfied." [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 3:29 pm
  The N.Y Court of Appeals, however, agreed with the District Court that Judiciary Law 487 does not derive from common law fraud. [read post]
In his referral, the ED observes that no words included in a law must be considered superfluous, and the fact that Article 139(2)(b) EUTMR does not talk about ‘final’ decision suggests that a refusal need not be final to exclude conversion. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 10:14 pm by Leiza Dolghih
” According to the Court of Appeals, a party does so when “it has taken specific and deliberate actions, after the filing of the suit, that are inconsistent with the right to arbitrate or has actively tried, but failed, to achieve a satisfactory result through litigation before turning to arbitration. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 2:13 am by Brian Cordery
The Court of Appeal has taken a pragmatic view, noting that the negotiation framework set out by the European Court of Justice in Huawei v ZTE provides a ‘safe harbour’ for SEP owners but does not set out mandatory conditions for negotiations. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 10:14 am by Nancy Braman
The appeal clarifies once again that sovereign immunity may be used only as a shield, not a sword. [read post]